IASB published an article on the annual cohort requirement in the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts. In the article, the IASB Chair Hans Hoogervorst explains the IASB decision to retain, unchanged, the annual cohort requirement in IFRS 17 for grouping insurance contracts to measure and recognize profit. IASB has decided annual cohorts are necessary to provide useful information about the financial performance of an insurance company, in particular about the changes in profitability over time. Any exemption from the requirement, even if aimed at the very limited population of contracts for which the costs and benefits of the requirement might be open to question, runs too great a risk of an unacceptable loss of information.
IASB has concluded its re-deliberations of the exposure draft of targeted amendments to IFRS 17. The requirement to use annual cohorts as part of the process of accounting for the contractual service margin has been the cause of much debate since IFRS 17 was issued. In their responses to the exposure draft, some stakeholders advocated the removal or amendment of the annual cohort requirement for some or all insurance contracts. However, IASB decided, in February 2020, to confirm the requirements in IFRS 17 relating to annual cohorts.
IASB considered different approaches for the aggregation of insurance contracts into groups or portfolios, including segregation based on similar profitability. The analysis concluded that the best approach is one where insurance contracts are broadly grouped based on expected profitability at initial recognition, including the separation of any contracts that are onerous at initial recognition. To this, the annual cohort requirement was added, meaning that all contracts in a group must have originated within a twelve-month period. IASB decided that the cohort approach is essential to ensure that aggregation is not so great as to render profit measures meaningless. If annual cohorts are not applied, then it is likely that:
- there will be co-mingling of different generations of contracts with different profitability, or different changes in profitability, which could result in profit being anticipated or deferred rather than being recognized as it is earned. These effects on the recognition of profit obscure the presentation of the effects of different pricing decisions at different times, resulting in a lack of accountability for such decisions and impaired ability for users of financial statements to model future profitability.
- the recognition of a loss arising from onerous insurance contracts would be delayed, potentially for many years.
As a result, the absence of annual cohorts might lead to highly imprudent accounting, because of the failure to recognize profits or losses on contracts in the appropriate periods. IASB is currently finalizing the amendments to aid implementation of IFRS 17 and expects to issue them in June 2020.
Keywords: International, Insurance, Accounting, IFRS 17, Insurance Contracts, Annual Cohorts, IASB
Previous ArticleFASB Issues Q&A on Hedge Accounting During COVID-19 Pandemic
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.