PRA published a letter to CEOs of insurance firms in run-off, reminding them that they should closely consider the supervisory statement SS4/14 on capital extractions by run-off firms within the general insurance sector when preparing a request for capital extraction for submission to PRA. The SS4/14 sets out the PRA expectations of firms, along with its approach to reviewing the capital extraction requests. This letter seeks to provide further clarity on such expectations and is not intended to supersede SS4/14.
Firms in run-off have limited ability to generate new capital. PRA expects firms to be prudent and ensure that policyholders would maintain an adequate level of protection following any suggested capital extraction. PRA expects firms to demonstrate clearly in their application how the board has satisfied itself that the request is appropriate and meets the expectations in SS4/14. The letter also includes examples of the types of information expected to accompany a capital extraction request such as an analysis of the underlying exposures and an assessment of the expected duration of run-off; a Standard Formula Appropriateness assessment; and a set of robust stress tests that demonstrate the resilience of the capital position post extraction.
PRA frequently reviews capital extraction requests from insurance firms in run-off. During the last two years, it has been observed that the quality of the accompanying information for some of these requests has been inadequate. Particular areas where firms are typically falling short against the PRA expectations are in the provision of information related to stress tests and reserving. This inevitably leads to delays in the PRA assessment and an inefficient use of resources for both, PRA and the firms.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, Capital Extraction, Run-off, SS4/14, Stress Testing, PRA
Previous ArticleFHFA Order on Stress Testing Result Reporting by Regulated Entities
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
PRA published updates in relation to the 2021 Supervisory Benchmarking Portfolio exercise.
HKMA revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.