APRA released the results of a review of remuneration practices at large financial institutions. The findings reveal considerable room for improvement in the design and implementation of executive remuneration structures.
The review found that remuneration frameworks and practices did not consistently and effectively promote sound risk management and long-term financial soundness; they fell short of the better practices set out in the existing guidance of APRA. The report identified the need for improvement in:
- Ensuring practices were adopted that were appropriate to the size, complexity, and risk profile of an institution
- The extent to which risk outcomes were assessed, and weighted, within performance scorecards
- Enforcement of accountability mechanisms in response to poor risk outcomes
- Evidence of the rationale for remuneration decisions
Chairman Wayne Byres said APRA encouraged all regulated institutions to review their remuneration frameworks and address any areas where the findings indicated room for improvement. "Both the design and implementation of performance-based remuneration must support effective risk management and the long-term financial soundness of each institution. In this regard, there is considerable room for improvement," Mr. Byres said. In response to the findings, APRA will consider ways to strengthen its prudential framework. A future review of the relevant prudential standards and guidance will take account of the forthcoming Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) as well as the international best practices. Any revisions to the prudential framework will be subject to APRA’s usual practices of stakeholder consultation and engagement.
The APRA review comprised detailed analysis of executive remuneration practices and outcomes from a sample of 12 regulated institutions across the authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurance, and superannuation sectors. The sample of institutions reviewed collectively accounts for a material proportion of the total assets of the Australian financial system.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Insurance, Remuneration, Best Practices, APRA
BCBS published a technical amendment to the capital treatment of securitizations of non-performing loans by banks.
BoE announced that the Data and Statistics Division is planning to move collection of statistical data to the BoE Electronic Data Submission (BEEDS) portal.
APRA published the updated reporting standards and guidance for the collection of Economic and Financial Statistics (EFS), following a consultation process. Also published was a response letter to the feedback received on the proposal for amending the EFS reporting standards and guidance.
EC is consulting on a draft delegated regulation to supplement the Taxonomy Regulation (2020/852) by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as environmentally sustainable.
The IFRS Foundation published material highlighting the ways in which existing requirements in IFRS standards require companies to consider climate-related matters when their effect is material to the financial statements.
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.