APRA released the results of a review of remuneration practices at large financial institutions. The findings reveal considerable room for improvement in the design and implementation of executive remuneration structures.
The review found that remuneration frameworks and practices did not consistently and effectively promote sound risk management and long-term financial soundness; they fell short of the better practices set out in the existing guidance of APRA. The report identified the need for improvement in:
- Ensuring practices were adopted that were appropriate to the size, complexity, and risk profile of an institution
- The extent to which risk outcomes were assessed, and weighted, within performance scorecards
- Enforcement of accountability mechanisms in response to poor risk outcomes
- Evidence of the rationale for remuneration decisions
Chairman Wayne Byres said APRA encouraged all regulated institutions to review their remuneration frameworks and address any areas where the findings indicated room for improvement. "Both the design and implementation of performance-based remuneration must support effective risk management and the long-term financial soundness of each institution. In this regard, there is considerable room for improvement," Mr. Byres said. In response to the findings, APRA will consider ways to strengthen its prudential framework. A future review of the relevant prudential standards and guidance will take account of the forthcoming Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) as well as the international best practices. Any revisions to the prudential framework will be subject to APRA’s usual practices of stakeholder consultation and engagement.
The APRA review comprised detailed analysis of executive remuneration practices and outcomes from a sample of 12 regulated institutions across the authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurance, and superannuation sectors. The sample of institutions reviewed collectively accounts for a material proportion of the total assets of the Australian financial system.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Insurance, Remuneration, Best Practices, APRA
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.