Ignazio Angeloni, Member of the ECB Supervisory Board, at the XXXI Convegno “Adolfo Beria di Argentine” in Courmayeur, spoke about the working and the challenges of the new European banking supervision, as part of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM). He also discussed state of the legal framework of banking supervision in the EU and the crisis management framework of the banking union.
Mr. Angeloni described the way ECB and the national competent authorities work closely together on supervisory matters and examined the legislative framework in which the SSM operates. He added that the EU institutions are engaged in a thorough review of the EU banking legal framework, following proposals tabled last Autumn by EC. The proposed amendments implement important international regulatory standards in European legislation, which rightly push the prudential approach further in the direction of being more risk-sensitive. “ECB fully supports the proposal to grant capital and liquidity waivers within banking groups operating on a cross-border basis in the EU. We see this proposal as consistent with the aims of the banking union project, by promoting the efficient management of resources within the group and fostering banking integration.”
He then discussed the two areas in which the EC’s proposals could be improved: one relates to harmonization and the other to supervisory discretion. “EC proposals frame the supervisor’s ability to set capital requirements under Pillar 2 in a manner which is excessively tight in our view. The proposal to frame Pillar 2 decisions in technical standards issued by EBA may prove too restrictive, limiting supervisory flexibility. The proposal also restricts the supervisor’s ability to collect information beyond regular statistical reporting. Ad-hoc gathering of statistical and other information remains essential, especially for a new authority like the SSM. In our experience, this has been invaluable to conduct thematic reviews in less-explored areas of supervision, like, for example, governance and business model comparison.” Regarding harmonization, he said that establishing a level playing field is impossible if the single supervisor needs to apply different legal frameworks in different countries. “The legislator can help either by expanding the scope of directly applicable norms, or by placing the in-built margins of flexibility of the legislation in the hands of the supervisory authority; in this case, ECB can at least harmonize rules at the SSM level. This was done last year, in part, in our policy on options and discretions, which you may be familiar with.”
Mr. Angeloni states that, from an operational point of view, the new crisis management framework has worked. In the context of the crisis management framework, he also discussed a number of points that merit close attention by supervisors going forward. He also added that it may be worth reflecting on ways to give European bank crisis management a more established format, also looking at international best practices. As per his concluding statement, “European supervision is still young and its journey has just started. There are plenty of items in our “to do list” for the years ahead.”
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Crisis Management Framework, Banking Union, SSM, ECB
Previous ArticleEBA Reports on Funding Plans and Asset Encumbrance of Banks in EU
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.