General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
September 22, 2017

Ignazio Angeloni, Member of the ECB Supervisory Board, at the XXXI Convegno “Adolfo Beria di Argentine” in Courmayeur, spoke about the working and the challenges of the new European banking supervision, as part of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM). He also discussed state of the legal framework of banking supervision in the EU and the crisis management framework of the banking union.

Mr. Angeloni described the way ECB and the national competent authorities work closely together on supervisory matters and examined the legislative framework in which the SSM operates. He added that the EU institutions are engaged in a thorough review of the EU banking legal framework, following proposals tabled last Autumn by EC. The proposed amendments implement important international regulatory standards in European legislation, which rightly push the prudential approach further in the direction of being more risk-sensitive. “ECB fully supports the proposal to grant capital and liquidity waivers within banking groups operating on a cross-border basis in the EU. We see this proposal as consistent with the aims of the banking union project, by promoting the efficient management of resources within the group and fostering banking integration.”

 

He then discussed the two areas in which the EC’s proposals could be improved: one relates to harmonization and the other to supervisory discretion. “EC proposals frame the supervisor’s ability to set capital requirements under Pillar 2 in a manner which is excessively tight in our view. The proposal to frame Pillar 2 decisions in technical standards issued by EBA may prove too restrictive, limiting supervisory flexibility. The proposal also restricts the supervisor’s ability to collect information beyond regular statistical reporting. Ad-hoc gathering of statistical and other information remains essential, especially for a new authority like the SSM. In our experience, this has been invaluable to conduct thematic reviews in less-explored areas of supervision, like, for example, governance and business model comparison.” Regarding harmonization, he said that establishing a level playing field is impossible if the single supervisor needs to apply different legal frameworks in different countries. “The legislator can help either by expanding the scope of directly applicable norms, or by placing the in-built margins of flexibility of the legislation in the hands of the supervisory authority; in this case, ECB can at least harmonize rules at the SSM level. This was done last year, in part, in our policy on options and discretions, which you may be familiar with.”


Mr. Angeloni states that, from an operational point of view, the new crisis management framework has worked. In the context of the crisis management framework, he also discussed a number of points that merit close attention by supervisors going forward. He also added that it may be worth reflecting on ways to give European bank crisis management a more established format, also looking at international best practices. As per his concluding statement, “European supervision is still young and its journey has just started. There are plenty of items in our “to do list” for the years ahead.”

 

Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Crisis Management Framework, Banking Union, SSM, ECB

Related Insights
News

OFR Adopts Data Collection Rule on Centrally Cleared Repo Transactions

OFR adopted a final rule to establish a data collection covering centrally cleared funding transactions in the U.S. repurchase agreement (repo) market.

February 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FHFA Finalizes Rule on Federal Home Loan Bank Capital Requirements

FHFA published, in Federal Register, the final rule to adopt, as its own, portions of the regulations of the Federal Housing Finance Board pertaining to the capital requirements for the Federal Home Loan Banks.

February 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Publishes PS4/19 on Loss-Absorbency Mechanism Under Solvency II

PRA published a policy statement (PS4/19) that provides feedback on responses to the consultation paper (CP27/18) on adjusting for the reduction of loss absorbency where own fund instruments are taxed on write down under Solvency II.

February 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SRB Publishes Framework for Performing Valuations in Resolution

The framework provides independent valuers and the general public with an indication of the expectations of SRB on the principles and methodologies for valuation reports, as set out in the legal framework.

February 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Extend Consultation Period for the Proposed SA-CCR

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) extended the comment period for a proposed rule to update their standards for how firms measure counterparty credit risk posed by derivative contracts.

February 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Extends Consultation Period for Stress Testing Rule

FED has published in the Federal Register a notice proposing amendments to the company run and supervisory stress test rules.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for February 2019

EBA published answers to two questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SEC Proposes Rule on Risk Mitigation Techniques for Uncleared SBS

SEC proposed a rule that would require the application of specific risk-mitigation techniques to portfolios of security-based swaps (SBS) that are not submitted for clearing.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Report Examines Financial Stability Implications of Fintech

FSB published a report that assesses fintech-related market developments and their potential implications for financial stability.

February 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Amend Regulatory Capital Rule to Allow Phase-In for CECL

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted the final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes banking organizations’ implementation of the current expected credit losses (CECL) methodology.

February 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2618