PRA Issues Policy Statement on Liquidity Risk Management for Insurers
PRA published a policy statement (PS18/19) that contains the final supervisory statement (SS5/19) on liquidity risk management for insurers. PS18/19 also provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP4/19 on liquidity risk management for insurers. PS18/19 is relevant to all UK Solvency II firms, including in respect of the Solvency II groups provisions, the Society of Lloyd’s and its managing agents, and non-directive insurers.
The areas addressed in SS5/19 include the following:
- Development and maintenance of proper policies, systems, controls, and processes (Chapter 2)
- Identification of material liquidity risk drivers (Chapter 3)
- Design and undertaking of forward-looking scenario analysis and stress testing programs (Chapter 4)
- Considerations for the inclusion of highly liquid assets in the liquidity buffer (Chapter 5)
- Use of quantitative metrics and tools for measuring and monitoring liquidity risk drivers (Chapter 6)
- Effective contingency planning (Chapter 7)
PRA received thirteen responses to CP4/19. Respondents generally welcomed the proposals, and made a number of observations and requests for clarification. PRA’s feedback to these responses is set out in Chapter 2 of PS18/19. After considering the responses, PRA has made some changes to the draft policy. The most significant amendments involve clarifying expectations of PRA on the definition of risk limits within the liquidity risk appetite framework of an insurer and the role of the board in managing liquidity risk. In addition, the function and characteristics of the liquidity buffer have been clarified. A number of editorial amendments were made to improve the clarity of SS5/19 and are not explicitly addressed in PS18/19.
The expectations set out in SS5/19 and the withdrawal of Legacy Supervisory Statement (LSS) 2/13 on expectations in relation to firms' risk management practices have immediate effect. SS5/19 should be read in conjunction with SS1/19 on the PRA approach after the withdrawal of UK from EU and with the joint BoE and PRA Statement of Policy (SoP) on interpretation of EU guidelines and recommendations related to the BoE and PRA approach after the withdrawal of UK from EU.
Related Links
Effective Date: September 24, 2019
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, Solvency II, Stress Testing, Liquidity Risk, PS 18/19, SS 5/19, Liquidity Risk Management, PRA
Featured Experts
Adam Koursaris
Asset and liability management expert; capable modeler; risk and capital specialist
Amnon Levy
Financial researcher; authority in credit portfolio management and AI/ML, risk-based pricing, climate and credit, CECL/IFRS 9; credit and ALM
Emil Lopez
Credit risk modeling advisor; IFRS 9 researcher; data quality and risk reporting manager
Previous Article
OCC Publishes Report on Trading and Derivatives Activities of BanksRelated Articles
|
News
UK Regulators Announce Measures to Address Impact of COVID-19UK Regulatory Authorities published statements and guidance addressed to financial entities on dealing with the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak.
March 26, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ISDA and Industry Request Delay in Timeline for Initial Margin RulesConsidering the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, ISDA submitted a letter on behalf of 21 industry associations and their members requesting BCBS, IOSCO, and global regulators to suspend the current timeline for the initial margin phase-in.
March 26, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FCA, FRC, and PRA Issue Joint Statement to Address Impact of COVID-19In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, FCA, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), and PRA have announced a series of actions and made statements to support the continued functioning of capital markets in the UK.
March 26, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EC Rule Corrects Regulation Supplementing Solvency II DirectiveEC published the EU Delegated Regulation 2020/442, which corrects the EU Delegated Regulation 2015/35 that supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC).
March 26, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FED and FFIEC Offer Reporting Relief to Institutions Due to COVID-19FED and FFIEC announced regulatory reporting relief to financial institutions due to disruptions caused by the COVID-19.
March 26, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA and ESMA Clarify Accounting Implications of COVID-19 MeasuresEBA and ESMA issued statements to address certain accounting implications of the economic support and relief measures adopted by EU member states in response to the COVID-19 crisis.
March 25, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
IOSCO and Securities Regulators Coordinate Responses to COVID-19IOSCO members are cooperating closely on their responses to the COVID-19-related disruption in capital markets.
March 25, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
US Agencies Issue Interim MMLF Rule, FED Updates FR Y-14 FormsIn an effort to mitigate the impact of economic disruptions due to the COVID-19 outbreak, Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (MMLF) was launched in the US to enhance the liquidity and functioning of money markets and to support the economy.
March 25, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ESRB Updates List of Countercyclical Capital Buffers in March 2020ESRB updated the list of countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) rates applicable in countries in the Eurosystem.
March 24, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FHFA Amends Stress Testing Rule for Regulated EntitiesFHFA adopted a final rule that amends the stress testing rule, in line with section 401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.
March 24, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
