Featured Product

    CFTC Chairman Speaks About Cross-Border Application of the Swaps Rules

    September 06, 2018

    At the Eurofi Financial Forum in Vienna, the CFTC Chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo emphasized that effective cross-border relations are central to the mission of CFTC because of the global nature of the futures and derivatives markets, which the CFTC regulates. He also outlined his plans for the swaps reform regulation and discussed about the CFTC regulations in the context of the third country equivalence regime of EU.

    Although the CFTC Chair appreciates the accomplishment, with Vice President Dombrovskis last Fall, of equivalence for U.S. trading venues and exemptions for EU trading venues, he remains concerned with proposals and pronouncements in EU about financial regulation and supervision of third-country firms that seem to reject deference as the governing principle for cross-border regulation. He said: “We are all aware of the history of cross-border regulation between the CFTC and EU. Many here in Europe understandably criticized past CFTC actions for over-extending CFTC rules to European markets and firms.” He then mentioned that, earlier this week, in Europe, he presented new views on how best to apply swaps reform regulation to firms and transactions across borders. He announced that he will shortly publish a comprehensive and detailed white paper that analyzes the shortcomings of the current approach of CFTC and recommends improvements that better allow cross-border derivatives markets to thrive while meeting the goals of G20. He said that this white paper will serve as a roadmap for a series of rule makings that he intends to put forward to the full CFTC Commission and, with their input, thereafter for public notice and comment and eventually adoption. He called on the policymakers and regulators of Europe to join him in adopting a similar approach to the cross-border application of swaps reform regulation. 

    The CFTC Chair said, “We have a rare and precious opportunity to trust one another; to put into place contemporaneously laws, rules, and regulations that enshrine regulatory and supervisory deference in how we treat third country firms and transactions.” EU should commit to an equivalence determinations process that focuses on achieving comparable regulatory outcomes and not rule-by-rule exactitude.  Thus, EU can provide necessary legal and regulatory certainty to third country firms. EU should rely as much as possible on third country regulators and supervisors. He wants CFTC to do the same. However, he expressed a concern that the current EU legislative proposals on central counterparty (CCP) supervision are going in a different direction. These proposals, when understood alongside comments from some European officials, raise doubt about continuance of the policy of deference. He is concerned that decisions made in the next few months may end up having a deleterious effect on transatlantic financial trade. He said he will embark CFTC on the course of greater regulatory deference, including concrete proposals to further open up the CFTC regulatory regime to European firms and markets. His proposal seeks to recognize the power and authority of EU authorities to regulate and supervise the European market with limited involvement from CFTC. It welcomes an EU approach that will do the same to U.S. firms and markets. However, this is one approach.

    The other approach, he said, is to reject what he puts forward and to continue down the path of expanding direct European regulation and supervision over third country firms. He said: “The choice of approach is yours to make. I sincerely hope that we all recognize the unique opportunity before us to achieve true regulatory coordination between the U.S. and Europe. It is time to seize that opportunity by putting in place the relevant laws, standards, and policies to reciprocate our path of deference with a European re-commitment to that most beneficial approach. Or reject this approach and turn down that very different path of overlapping and confounding cross-border regulation with its high regulatory cost and constraints on economic growth. This would be the legacy of policymakers making such a choice.” He clarified that the course to be set for CFTC will be robustly debated in the United States. The prospect of this course being fully implemented will be greatly enhanced if EU and other non-U.S. counterparts pursue a common approach. In closing, he said that “I look to you to make the right choice and to express your choice with clear statements and clear legislative and regulatory actions.”

    Keywords: Americas, Europe, US, EU, Securities, Swaps Reform, Cross Border Cooperation, Third Country, Equivalence Regime, CFTC

    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Revises Related Entities Standard for Banks

    APRA published a strengthened prudential standard APS 222 on associations with related entities, with the aim to mitigate contagion risk within banking groups.

    August 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Revises Implementation Schedule for Initial Margin Rules

    HKMA intends to adopt a revised implementation schedule for the margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

    August 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Revises Guideline on Application of Banking Disclosure Rules

    HKMA issued a revised version of the Supervisory Policy Manual module CA-D-1 on guideline on the application of the Banking (Disclosure) Rules (BDR).

    August 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Decision on Recognizing Reporting Member States Under AnaCredit

    ECB has finalized the Decision 2019/1348 (ECB/2019/20) that establishes procedure for recognizing non-euro area member states as reporting member states under the AnaCredit Regulation (EU 2016/867).

    August 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes to Extend CECL Standard Deadline for Certain Entities

    FASB proposed an Accounting Standards Update that would grant private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and certain small public companies additional time to implement FASB standards on current expected credit losses (CECL), leases, and hedging.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IASB Adds Phase Two of IBOR Reform to Its Work Plan

    IASB (or the Board) has added the second phase of its project focused on potential financial reporting implications linked to the interest rate benchmark reform—interbank offer rate (IBOR) reform—to its work plan.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Updates Draft Instructions for Proposed FR Y-14 Reporting Forms

    FED updated draft instructions for the monthly, quarterly, and annual capital assessments and stress testing reports, also known as forms FR Y-14M, FR Y-14Q, FR Y-14A, respectively.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes Taxonomy Changes Related to Topics 326, 815, and 842

    FASB is proposing taxonomy improvements for the proposed Accounting Standards Update on clarifying the interactions among topic 321 on investments in equity securities), topic 323 on investments under equity method and joint ventures), and topic 815 on derivatives and hedging.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OCC Updates Bank Accounting Advisory Series in August 2019

    OCC released an update to the Bank Accounting Advisory Series (BAAS), which reflects accounting standards issued by FASB, through March 31, 2019, on topics such as hedging and credit losses.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Consults on Final Phase Margin Rules for Uncleared Derivatives

    APRA is consulting on amendments to the prudential standard CPS 226 on margin and risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

    August 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3656