At a conference in Spain, Claudio Borio of BIS termed the adoption of IFRS 9—the new expected credit loss provisioning standard—as a landmark. He also discussed the implications of IFRS 9 for financial stability.
Mr. Borio highlighted that, although "the new standard is likely to mitigate the procyclicality of the financial system to some extent relative to the previous, incurred loss model, it falls short by a significant margin of what one would like from a financial stability perspective." This points to broader inevitable tensions between accounting and prudential regulation and calls for the active use of backstops (or so-called prudential filters) to preserve stability. Experience with the operation of the alternative dynamic (countercyclical) credit loss provisioning scheme adopted by the Bank of Spain points to some strengths and weaknesses in the broader macro-prudential frameworks in which such arrangements are embedded. He believes that that macro-prudential frameworks are part of the solution, but not the whole solution to procyclicality.
In particular, the active deployment of macro-prudential tools in some countries, mainly emerging market economies, has not prevented the emergence of the familiar signs of the build-up of dangerous financial imbalances in the form of cumulative credit growth and asset price increases, notably property prices, in excess of historical benchmarks. These elements are the basis of the early warning indicators that worked well in the pre-global-financial-crisis period. The Spanish experience with dynamic provisions confirms this assessment. According to the analysis of the Bank of Spain, dynamic provisions have not succeeded in restraining credit growth significantly. Other measures, such as maximum loan-to-value ratios and debt service-to-income ratios, have a larger impact. However, he believes that tackling the financial cycle requires a more holistic policy framework, which in addition to sound prudential standards also involves monetary and fiscal policy, and even structural policies. This is what is called a "macro-financial stability framework" at BIS. He concludes that there is a material risk that unrealistic expectations about what macro-prudential frameworks can deliver stand in the way of desirable adjustments in monetary and fiscal policies.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: International, Banking, IFRS 9, Financial Stability, ECL, Procyclicality, Macro-prudential Framework, BIS
Previous ArticleFDIC Proposes to Renew Three Approved Information Collections
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).
EBA finalized the guidelines on treatment of structural foreign-exchange (FX) positions under Article 352(2) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
FSB published a statement on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on global benchmark transition.
IAIS published the list of Internationally Active Insurance Groups (IAIGs) publicly disclosed by group-wide supervisors.
FED has temporarily revised the reporting form on consolidated financial statements for holding companies (FR Y-9C; OMB No. 7100-0128).
EC launched a consultation on the review of the key elements of Solvency II Directive, with the comment period ending on October 21, 2020.
ECB launched a consultation on the guide that sets out supervisory approach to consolidation projects in the banking sector.
PRA published a letter that builds on the expectations set out in the supervisory statement (SS3/19) on enhancing banks' and insurers' approaches to managing the financial risks from climate change.
US Agencies (Farm Credit Administration, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) finalized changes to the swap margin rule to facilitate implementation of prudent risk management strategies at banks and other entities with significant swap activities.
IAIS published technical specifications, questionnaires, and templates for 2020 Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) and Aggregation Method data collections.