ESMA Chair Speaks on IFRS 9 from Perspective of Securities Regulators
During his keynote speech at the Banco de Espana in Madrid, ESMA Chair Steven Maijoor discussed the implementation and enforcement of IFRS 9 standard from the perspective of securities markets regulators. He addressed three issues related to the expected credit loss (ECL) model: quantitative impact of IFRS 9; transparency and understandability of the ECL model by investors; and role of auditors and supervisory cooperation.
In its annual European Common Enforcement Priorities for 2018 year-end, ESMA focuses on some of the application issues of IFRS 9. The focus will be on the need for transparency and disclosures on the assumptions of ECL models and on the key judgments made. Based on the average reported quantitative impact in the financial statements, the introduction of IFRS 9 as of January 01, 2018 had, in most countries, a lower quantitative impact than originally expected. However, the widely reported headline figure of the impact on regulatory capital across the industry might not give the entire picture. Given the complexity of modeling and the role of judgment in determining some of the assumptions used in the ECL calculation, it cannot be excluded that new inconsistencies in the implementation of the provisioning are arising in practice.
He then highlighted that multiple scenarios need to be reflected in the ECL modeling, given the non-linear nature of credit losses in response to a deteriorating economic outlook. In this context, he discussed that the last report of the Joint Committee of ESAs on risk and vulnerabilities in the EU financial system identifies repricing of risk premia and potential increase of interest rates as key factors that could negatively affect financial institutions. Thus, it is important that all relevant risks identified are reflected in ECL models. While discussing the transparency and understandability of the ECL model, he highlighted the importance of disclosing material assumptions and judgments made in estimating ECL and emphasized that banks should disclose their approach to setting the criteria for identifying the significant increase in credit risk for material portfolios. He also mentioned that banks should explain how they are taking into account forward-looking information in determining the ECL and that there is a need to disclose information on the multiple scenarios capturing the non-linear nature of the credit losses under the downturn scenario.
He commented on the scope of the involvement of auditors and supervisors in assessing the ECL model and emphasized the need for close cooperation between supervisors in assessing the implementation of IFRS 9, as highlighted in the 2017 report of ESRB. Supervisors need to step up their efforts in capacity building and gain experience in assessing ECL models. The new ECL model poses challenges for both banking supervisors and accounting enforcers within their respective remits. Accounting enforcers are developing their expertise to scrutinize more complex ECL models used in the financial statements. He believes that communication, cooperation, exchange of information as well as practical experience between accounting enforcers and banking supervisors need to be further reinforced to reflect the increased complexity of the ECL models. This is essential to ensure high quality, consistent implementation of IFRS 9.
Related Link: Speech (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Accounting, Banking, Securities, IFRS 9, Expected Credit Loss, Credit Risk, Disclosures, ESMA
Previous Article
HKMA Amends Guidelines on AML/CFT for Banks and SVF LicenseesRelated Articles
|
News
US Agencies Consult on Capital Treatment of Land Development LoansUS Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) issued a proposed rule on the treatment of loans that finance the development of land for purposes of the one- to four-family residential properties exclusion in the definition of high volatility commercial real estate (HVCRE) exposure in the regulatory capital rule.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for July 2019Under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week, EBA published answers to five questions related to supervisory reporting.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ESMA Updates Manual for European Single Electronic Format in EUESMA updated the reporting manual for European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FED Updates Supplemental Instructions for Reporting Form FR Y-9CFED updated the supplemental instructions for FR Y-9C reporting.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Publishes Report on Monitoring Implementation of LCR in EUEBA published its first report on the monitoring of the implementation of liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) in EU.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
APRA Applies Additional Capital Requirements to Three Australian BanksAPRA is applying additional capital requirements to three major banks in Australia to reflect higher operational risk identified in their risk governance self-assessments.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
IMF Report on 2019 Article IV Consultation on Euro Area PoliciesIMF published its staff report in context of the 2019 Article IV consultation on euro area policies with member countries.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FSB to Survey Practices on Cyber Incident Response and RecoveryFSB launched a survey on the industry practices on cyber incident response and recovery.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ECB Appoints New Members of Supervisory BoardThe Governing Council of ECB appointed Edouard Fernandez-Bollo, Kerstin af Jochnick, and Elizabeth McCaul as representatives to the Supervisory Board of ECB Banking Supervision, for a five-year non-renewable term.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
OSFI Consults on Applying Proportionality to Pillar 1 Rules in CanadaOSFI published a discussion paper seeks input on possible tailoring of the capital and liquidity requirements for small and medium-size deposit-taking institutions.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
