General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
October 04, 2018

While speaking at the sixth Annual Community Banking Research and Policy Conference in Missouri, Randal K. Quarles of FED said that the numbers of urban and rural community banks have been declining over the past 20 years, but community banks continue to play an important role in both types of markets and they still account for over 95% of banks operating in the United States. He discussed the differences among community banks in terms of size and markets served (urban versus rural) and emphasized that community banks operating in rural and urban areas tend to face different challenges.

The number of banks in the United States fell by almost half over the past 20 years—from about 10,700 in 1997 to about 5,600 in 2017. About 97% of the decrease was accounted for by community banks. Although the number of banks in both of these categories has been falling over time, the rate of decline was steeper for rural banks than for urban banks before the financial crisis but has reversed in the post-crisis period. In terms of performance measures, rural community banks consistently outperform urban community banks with regard to return on assets and return on equity. This difference was particularly pronounced during the financial crisis, when profitability fell much more sharply at urban community banks than at rural community banks. The data suggest that, despite facing a more challenging economic environment, rural community banks appear to be holding their own relative to urban community banks. Even if the data indicate that most rural markets are well-served, focus should be on the markets that may not be as well-served and how that is affecting the people who bank, or cannot bank, there. That is why the Community Development function of FED has undertaken a national series of listening sessions to assess the real effects of bank closures on rural communities. 

For residents in a particular community, the closure has not been much of a problem, as they do most of their routine banking online and even noted that they did not think automated teller machines (ATMs) were necessary because most of the retail businesses in town offer cash back with debit card purchases. Nonetheless, residents spoke positively about the importance of the personal touch a local bank can provide. Residents liked familiar faces at the teller window and loan officers who understand the local economy when making small business loan decisions. Moreover, online banking is not necessarily an opportunity for everyone, depending, for example, on whether the necessary infrastructure is available. In Nicholas County, Kentucky, many residents do not have access to high-speed internet; this lack of access has led most residents to travel outside of the county to conduct their banking needs. This situation is certainly not optimal for anyone, but it presents a particular challenge to the elderly, those without a car, and busy small business owners who do not have time to travel 25 miles each way to make change and deposit checks. 

The loss of a bank branch also has a ripple effect on a community as a whole. In the village of Brushton, New York, which lost its only bank branch in 2014, small business owners commented that when residents must leave the village to access banking services, they are more likely to shop, eat, and pay for services in other towns, which creates additional hardship for the small businesses of Brushton. Additionally, as the ability of community members to access cash has decreased, credit card use has increased. Small business owners in Brushton say that this growth in credit card usage has significantly increased the cost of doing business. Lastly, one theme that was clear across the country was that the loss of a local bank meant the loss of an important civic institution. Banks do not just cash checks and make loans—they also place ads in small town newspapers, donate to local nonprofits, and sponsor local Little League teams. As towns lose banks and bankers, they also lose important local leaders. He reiterated that FED will continue to explore challenges faced by local communities and looks forward to sharing the collective results of these efforts in a report that should be published in early 2019.

 

Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Community Banks, Urban Banks, Rural Banks, Trends, FED

 

Related Insights
News

BCBS Finds Liquidity Risk Management Principles Remain Fit for Purpose

BCBS completed a review of its 2008 Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision. The review confirmed that the principles remain fit for purpose.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Urges Local Banks to Start Working on FRTB Implementation

HKMA announced that it plans to issue a consultation paper on the new market risk standard in the second quarter of 2019.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Finalizes Guidelines for High-Risk Exposures Under CRR

EBA published the final guidelines on the specification of types of exposures to be associated with high risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The guidelines are intended to facilitate a higher degree of comparability in terms of the current practices in identifying high-risk exposures.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

MAS Guidelines on Risk Mitigation Requirements for OTC Derivatives

MAS published guidelines on risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BoE Publishes the Schedule for Statistical Reporting for 2019

BoE published the updated schedule for statistical reporting for 2019. The reporting institutions use the online statistical data application (OSCA) to submit statistical data to BoE.

January 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Delays Final Direction on Reporting of Private Securitizations

PRA and FCA have delayed the issuance of final direction, including the final template, on reporting of private securitizations, from January 15, 2019 to the end of January 2019.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SNB Updates Forms on Supervisory Reporting for Banks

SNB published Version 1.7 of reporting forms (AUR_U, AUR_UEA, AUR_UES, AURH_U, AUR_K, AUR_KEA, and AURH_K) and the related documentation for supervisory reporting on an individual and consolidated basis.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Finalizes Market Risk Capital Framework and Work Program for 2019

BCBS published the final framework for market risk capital requirements and its work program for 2019. Also published was an explanatory note to provide a non-technical description of the overall market risk framework, the changes that have been incorporated into in this version of the framework and impact of the framework.

January 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for January 2019

EBA published answers to 13 questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

January 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Proposes to Amend Supervisory Statement on Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2473