ESMA published a statement that sets out the impact of Brexit on the ESMA Register for benchmark administrators and third-country benchmarks under the Benchmarks Regulation. The statement highlights that, post Brexit transition, the existing UK administrators will be deleted from the ESMA Register, as, by then, the Benchmarks Regulation will no longer be applicable to the benchmark administrators in UK. ESMA also published a final report setting out the updated regulatory technical standards that contain provisions ensuring that the governance arrangements of benchmark administrators are sufficiently robust and the potential manipulation of benchmarks is minimized, through additional rules on the methodology of calculation and controls to ensure the integrity of the data. These draft standards result from the ESAs Review and are expected to be submitted, by October 01, 2020, to EC, which will have three months in which to approve or reject them.
After the transition period for the withdrawal of UK from EU ends on December 31, 2020, UK administrators (that are included in the ESMA Register) will be deleted from the ESMA Register as the Benchmarks Regulation will by then no longer be applicable to the benchmark administrators in UK. During the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period until December 31, 2021, as defined in Article 51(4) of the Benchmarks Regulation, this change of the ESMA Register would not have an effect on the ability of EU27 supervised entities to use the benchmarks provided by those third-country UK administrators. During the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period, third-country benchmarks can still be used by supervised entities in EU if the benchmark is already used in EU as a reference for financial instruments, financial contracts, or for measuring the performance of an investment fund. Therefore, until December 31, 2021, EU supervised entities can use third-country UK benchmarks even if they are not included in the ESMA Register. This Benchmarks Regulation transitional provision would be applicable to the benchmarks provided by the UK administrators deleted from the ESMA Register because of Brexit.
In the absence of an equivalence decision by EC, UK administrators will have until the end of the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period of December 31, 2021 to apply for recognition or endorsement in EU, for the benchmarks provided by these UK administrators to be included in the ESMA Register again. Similarly, if some UK third-country benchmarks were included in the ESMA Register before the end of the Brexit transition period following a recognition or an endorsement status granted by the UK, those third-country benchmarks will be deleted from the ESMA Register after the end of the Brexit transition period. The Benchmarks Regulation transitional period until December 31, 2021 is also applicable to these third-country benchmarks endorsed or recognized in the UK. Therefore, during the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period, this deletion from the ESMA Register would not have an effect on the ability of EU27 supervised entities to use those third-country benchmarks that were endorsed or recognized in the UK before the end of the Brexit transition period. In the absence of an equivalence decision by EC, these third-country benchmarks previously endorsed or recognized in the UK will have until the end of the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period of December 31, 2021 to apply again for recognition or endorsement in EU, to be included in the ESMA Register.
- Press Release on Impact of Brexit
- Statement on Impact of Brexit (PDF)
- Press Release on Technical Standards
- Report on Technical Standards
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, Securities, Transition Period, Third Country Benchmarks, Regulatory Technical Standards, Benchmarks Regulation, ESMA
Previous ArticleEIB Provides Guarantee to Commerzbank to Support SMEs Amid Crisis
Next ArticleESRB Publishes Risk Dashboard in October 2020
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.