ESMA published a statement that sets out the impact of Brexit on the ESMA Register for benchmark administrators and third-country benchmarks under the Benchmarks Regulation. The statement highlights that, post Brexit transition, the existing UK administrators will be deleted from the ESMA Register, as, by then, the Benchmarks Regulation will no longer be applicable to the benchmark administrators in UK. ESMA also published a final report setting out the updated regulatory technical standards that contain provisions ensuring that the governance arrangements of benchmark administrators are sufficiently robust and the potential manipulation of benchmarks is minimized, through additional rules on the methodology of calculation and controls to ensure the integrity of the data. These draft standards result from the ESAs Review and are expected to be submitted, by October 01, 2020, to EC, which will have three months in which to approve or reject them.
After the transition period for the withdrawal of UK from EU ends on December 31, 2020, UK administrators (that are included in the ESMA Register) will be deleted from the ESMA Register as the Benchmarks Regulation will by then no longer be applicable to the benchmark administrators in UK. During the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period until December 31, 2021, as defined in Article 51(4) of the Benchmarks Regulation, this change of the ESMA Register would not have an effect on the ability of EU27 supervised entities to use the benchmarks provided by those third-country UK administrators. During the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period, third-country benchmarks can still be used by supervised entities in EU if the benchmark is already used in EU as a reference for financial instruments, financial contracts, or for measuring the performance of an investment fund. Therefore, until December 31, 2021, EU supervised entities can use third-country UK benchmarks even if they are not included in the ESMA Register. This Benchmarks Regulation transitional provision would be applicable to the benchmarks provided by the UK administrators deleted from the ESMA Register because of Brexit.
In the absence of an equivalence decision by EC, UK administrators will have until the end of the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period of December 31, 2021 to apply for recognition or endorsement in EU, for the benchmarks provided by these UK administrators to be included in the ESMA Register again. Similarly, if some UK third-country benchmarks were included in the ESMA Register before the end of the Brexit transition period following a recognition or an endorsement status granted by the UK, those third-country benchmarks will be deleted from the ESMA Register after the end of the Brexit transition period. The Benchmarks Regulation transitional period until December 31, 2021 is also applicable to these third-country benchmarks endorsed or recognized in the UK. Therefore, during the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period, this deletion from the ESMA Register would not have an effect on the ability of EU27 supervised entities to use those third-country benchmarks that were endorsed or recognized in the UK before the end of the Brexit transition period. In the absence of an equivalence decision by EC, these third-country benchmarks previously endorsed or recognized in the UK will have until the end of the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period of December 31, 2021 to apply again for recognition or endorsement in EU, to be included in the ESMA Register.
- Press Release on Impact of Brexit
- Statement on Impact of Brexit (PDF)
- Press Release on Technical Standards
- Report on Technical Standards
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, Securities, Transition Period, Third Country Benchmarks, Regulatory Technical Standards, Benchmarks Regulation, ESMA
Previous ArticleEIB Provides Guarantee to Commerzbank to Support SMEs Amid Crisis
Next ArticleESRB Publishes Risk Dashboard in October 2020
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.