Danièle Nouy, Chair of the ECB Supervisory Board, and Sharon Donnery, Chair of the ECB High Level Group on NPLs, spoke in Frankfurt about public consultation on the draft addendum to the ECB guidance to banks on non-performing loans (NPLs). They discussed the importance of resolving the issue of NPLs on bank balance sheets, along with the role of the ECB guidance in helping to resolve this issue.
Danièle Nouy on NPLs. She highlighted that NPLs weigh on balance sheets of banks, represent a drain on resources, and undermine trust in a bank. Speaking about the draft addendum to the ECB guidance on NPLs, she said: “Reducing the high stocks of NPLs is the first step. Banks must also ensure that the problem does not recur. And this forward-looking approach is supported by our draft addendum to the guidance. The draft addendum clarifies our supervisory expectations in respect of the provisioning of loans that become non-performing in the future.” However, the NPL issue needs to be addressed at other levels as well. For instance, significant differences exist between euro area countries when it comes to resolving NPLs in court. In some countries, such procedures take considerably longer than in others. National governments must address this by streamlining judicial systems and speeding up court procedures. In a Banking Union, there should be no significant differences in the time it takes to resolve NPLs in court. Out-of-court settlements should also become an instrument in resolving NPLs, added Ms. Nouy. She concludes that resolving the issue of NPLs requires a joint effort by banks, regulators, national governments, and EU institutions.
Sharon Donnery on NPLs. She explained the contents and purpose of the addendum to the ECB guidance on NPLs. She highlighted that the draft addendum is not a Pillar 2 measure; however, following supervisory dialog taking into account bank-specific circumstances, its implementation may result in individual Pillar 2 measures for certain banks. “ECB will give due consideration to a bank's position compared with its expectations, and in view of the specific circumstances of the bank. If, through this process, ECB still considers that bank's provisions do not adequately cover the credit risk, a supervisory measure under the Pillar 2 framework may be considered. However, if the ECB is satisfied with the explanations, no further action is proposed.” It can therefore be viewed as a three-stage process. First, as a transparent supervisor, ECB has clearly and consistently set out its supervisory expectations. Second, it will analyze bank-specific circumstances, strategies, governance and operations, recognition, accounting position, banks’ comments in the supervisory dialog, and so on, against these expectations. Third, this will be executed on a case-by-case basis and the results will be incorporated into bank-specific supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) decisions.
Related Link: Speeches (PDF)
Previous ArticleEC Amends Rules on Reporting Templates and Instructions Under CRR
PRA published a set of questions and answers (Q&A) covering common queries regarding residential and commercial property valuations, for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), during the period of disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
IOSCO proposed updates to its principles for regulated entities that outsource tasks to service providers.
MAS announced that the first phase of the Veritas initiative will commence with the development of fairness metrics in credit risk scoring and customer marketing.
BoE published the Statistical Notice 2020/4 to update the buy-to-let (BTL) Phase 2 and Phase 3 definitions for the Interest Rate Type data item.
FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.
EBA published an opinion following the notification by the French macro-prudential authority, the Haut Conseil de Stabilité Financière (HCSF), of its intention to extend a measure introduced in 2018 on the use of Article 458(9) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period.
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
ECB updated the guidance notes for reporting related to the statistics on holdings of securities by reporting banking groups (SHSG).