Featured Product

    Danièle Nouy of ECB on Addendum to the Guidance to Banks on NPLs

    November 30, 2017

    Danièle Nouy, Chair of the ECB Supervisory Board, and Sharon Donnery, Chair of the ECB High Level Group on NPLs, spoke in Frankfurt about public consultation on the draft addendum to the ECB guidance to banks on non-performing loans (NPLs). They discussed the importance of resolving the issue of NPLs on bank balance sheets, along with the role of the ECB guidance in helping to resolve this issue.

    Danièle Nouy on NPLs. She highlighted that NPLs weigh on balance sheets of banks, represent a drain on resources, and undermine trust in a bank. Speaking about the draft addendum to the ECB guidance on NPLs, she said: “Reducing the high stocks of NPLs is the first step. Banks must also ensure that the problem does not recur. And this forward-looking approach is supported by our draft addendum to the guidance. The draft addendum clarifies our supervisory expectations in respect of the provisioning of loans that become non-performing in the future.” However, the NPL issue needs to be addressed at other levels as well. For instance, significant differences exist between euro area countries when it comes to resolving NPLs in court. In some countries, such procedures take considerably longer than in others. National governments must address this by streamlining judicial systems and speeding up court procedures. In a Banking Union, there should be no significant differences in the time it takes to resolve NPLs in court. Out-of-court settlements should also become an instrument in resolving NPLs, added Ms. Nouy. She concludes that resolving the issue of NPLs requires a joint effort by banks, regulators, national governments, and EU institutions.

    Sharon Donnery on NPLs. She explained the contents and purpose of the addendum to the ECB guidance on NPLs. She highlighted that the draft addendum is not a Pillar 2 measure; however, following supervisory dialog taking into account bank-specific circumstances, its implementation may result in individual Pillar 2 measures for certain banks. “ECB will give due consideration to a bank's position compared with its expectations, and in view of the specific circumstances of the bank. If, through this process, ECB still considers that bank's provisions do not adequately cover the credit risk, a supervisory measure under the Pillar 2 framework may be considered. However, if the ECB is satisfied with the explanations, no further action is proposed.” It can therefore be viewed as a three-stage process. First, as a transparent supervisor, ECB has clearly and consistently set out its supervisory expectations. Second, it will analyze bank-specific circumstances, strategies, governance and operations, recognition, accounting position, banks’ comments in the supervisory dialog, and so on, against these expectations. Third, this will be executed on a case-by-case basis and the results will be incorporated into bank-specific supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) decisions.

     

    Related Link: Speeches (PDF)

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, NPLs, Pillar 2, Addendum, SREP, ECB

    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Revises Standard on Margin Rules for Uncleared Derivatives

    APRA revised CPS 226, which is the prudential standard on margin and risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Issues Consultation on Prudent Person Principle Under Solvency II

    PRA, via the consultation paper CP22/19, has set out its proposed expectations for investment by firms, in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle (PPP).

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Forms Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance

    EIOPA established the Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance to assist EIOPA in the development of digital responsibility principles in insurance.

    September 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FDIC Approves Proposal to Amend Swap Margin Rule

    FDIC approved what would be a joint proposal by the US Agencies (FCA, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) to amend regulations that require swap dealers and security-based swap dealers under the agencies’ respective jurisdictions to exchange margin with their counterparties for swaps that are not centrally cleared (Swap Margin Rule).

    September 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes Taxonomy Changes Related to Topics 848 and 470

    FASB proposed taxonomy improvements for the proposed Accounting Standards Update on topic 848 on facilitation of effects of reference rate reform on financial reporting.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Statement on Recalculating Transitional Measures Under Solvency II

    BoE notified that it will be willing to accept applications from firms to recalculate transitional measure on technical provisions (TMTP) as at September 30, 2019.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Hosts Conference to Discuss Issues from Emergence of Stablecoins

    BIS hosted a conference in Basel to discuss policy and regulatory issues posed by the emergence of stablecoin initiatives backed by financial institutions and large technology companies.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Paper on Embedded Supervision of Blockchain-Based Financial Market

    BIS published a working paper that investigates ways to regulate and supervise blockchain-based financial markets.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Paper on Market-Implied Systemic Risk and Shadow Capital Adequacy

    BoE published a working paper that presents a forward-looking approach to measure systemic solvency risk.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Consults on Policy Module on Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process

    HKMA is consulting on the revised Supervisory Policy Manual module CA-G-5 that sets out the HKMA approach to conducting the supervisory review process under Pillar 2.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3830