November 30, 2017

Danièle Nouy, Chair of the ECB Supervisory Board, and Sharon Donnery, Chair of the ECB High Level Group on NPLs, spoke in Frankfurt about public consultation on the draft addendum to the ECB guidance to banks on non-performing loans (NPLs). They discussed the importance of resolving the issue of NPLs on bank balance sheets, along with the role of the ECB guidance in helping to resolve this issue.

Danièle Nouy on NPLs. She highlighted that NPLs weigh on balance sheets of banks, represent a drain on resources, and undermine trust in a bank. Speaking about the draft addendum to the ECB guidance on NPLs, she said: “Reducing the high stocks of NPLs is the first step. Banks must also ensure that the problem does not recur. And this forward-looking approach is supported by our draft addendum to the guidance. The draft addendum clarifies our supervisory expectations in respect of the provisioning of loans that become non-performing in the future.” However, the NPL issue needs to be addressed at other levels as well. For instance, significant differences exist between euro area countries when it comes to resolving NPLs in court. In some countries, such procedures take considerably longer than in others. National governments must address this by streamlining judicial systems and speeding up court procedures. In a Banking Union, there should be no significant differences in the time it takes to resolve NPLs in court. Out-of-court settlements should also become an instrument in resolving NPLs, added Ms. Nouy. She concludes that resolving the issue of NPLs requires a joint effort by banks, regulators, national governments, and EU institutions.

Sharon Donnery on NPLs. She explained the contents and purpose of the addendum to the ECB guidance on NPLs. She highlighted that the draft addendum is not a Pillar 2 measure; however, following supervisory dialog taking into account bank-specific circumstances, its implementation may result in individual Pillar 2 measures for certain banks. “ECB will give due consideration to a bank's position compared with its expectations, and in view of the specific circumstances of the bank. If, through this process, ECB still considers that bank's provisions do not adequately cover the credit risk, a supervisory measure under the Pillar 2 framework may be considered. However, if the ECB is satisfied with the explanations, no further action is proposed.” It can therefore be viewed as a three-stage process. First, as a transparent supervisor, ECB has clearly and consistently set out its supervisory expectations. Second, it will analyze bank-specific circumstances, strategies, governance and operations, recognition, accounting position, banks’ comments in the supervisory dialog, and so on, against these expectations. Third, this will be executed on a case-by-case basis and the results will be incorporated into bank-specific supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) decisions.

 

Related Link: Speeches (PDF)

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, NPLs, Pillar 2, Addendum, SREP, ECB

Related Articles
News

BCBS and IOSCO Extend Implementation of Final Phase of Margin Rules

BCBS and IOSCO agree to one-year extension of the final implementation phase of the margin requirements for non centrally cleared derivatives.

July 23, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Proposes Stronger Remuneration Requirements in Australia

APRA is proposing to strengthen prudential requirements for remuneration across all APRA-regulated entities in the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries by issuing CPS 511, a new prudential standard on remuneration.

July 23, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Consults on Availability of Group Own Funds Under Solvency II

PRA published a consultation paper (CP16/19) that sets out its proposed approach to the determination of the availability of subordinated liabilities and preference shares in group own funds.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EIOPA Consults on Methodological Principles for Insurer Stress Testing

EIOPA published a discussion paper on the methodological principles for stress testing the insurance sector in EU.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Adopt Rule to Exclude Community Banks from Volcker Rule

US Agencies (CFTC, FDIC, FED, OCC, and SEC) adopted a final rule to exclude community banks from the Volcker Rule, in line with amendments to certain sections of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Adopt Amendments to Simplify Regulatory Capital Rules

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that reduces regulatory burden by simplifying several requirements in the regulatory capital rules for banks.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IA of Hong Kong Delegates Inspection and Investigation Powers to HKMA

HKMA and IA of Hong Kong jointly issued a statement announcing the delegation of the inspection and investigation powers of IA to HKMA, pursuant to the statutory regulatory regime for insurance intermediaries under the Insurance Ordinance.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Extends Implementation Timeline for Policy Recommendations on SFTs

FSB announced adjustments to the implementation timelines for its recommendations on securities financing transactions (SFTs), specifically those related to the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared SFTs.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for July 2019

EBA published answers to six questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool this week.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Report Assesses Regulatory Framework for Fintech Activities

EBA published the findings of its analysis on the regulatory framework applicable to fintech firms when accessing the market.

July 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3494