APRA published an information paper that sets out a more intensive regulatory approach to transform governance, culture, remuneration, and accountability (GCRA) practices across the prudentially regulated financial sector. The key attributes of the new approach to GCRA are strengthening prudential framework, sharpening supervisory focus, and sharing insights of APRA. This approach to GCRA is a multi-year strategy and a key pillar in the 2019-2023 Corporate Plan of APRA.
The new, intensified approach to GCRA is intended to strengthen the resilience of financial institutions, including addressing, and ideally preventing, issues, such as poor risk governance, misaligned incentives, and misconduct, that have undermined public confidence in the financial sector over recent years. This approach to GCRA seeks to incorporate a range of international practices with its own supervision philosophy in a way that is fit for purpose for the Australian financial system. While this approach builds on the recent work of APRA on GCRA, it represents a significant enhancement—in the resourcing, capability, and intensity—of its supervisory focus. This approach also reflects the willingness of APRA to use its powers more assertively to hold regulated entities and their boards and senior management to account for ensuring high standards of GCRA are maintained. The following are the key attributes of this new approach to GCRA:
- Strengthening the prudential framework in areas such as remuneration and risk management and incorporating the wider use of risk governance declarations and self-assessments
- Sharpening supervisory focus by increasing internal resourcing and capabilities for GCRA supervision, adopting new tools to assess GCRA practices, and holding entities more forcefully to account when deficiencies are identified
- Sharing insights to better inform industry and the public about the work of APRA, promoting better GCRA practices, and driving greater accountability among boards and management
The intended outcome of this intensified approach to GCRA is to drive genuine change across the industry, with success measured by
- Stronger governance frameworks and processes
- Organizations that understand and enable a risk culture that supports effective risk management practices and delivers sound prudential outcome
- Remuneration arrangements that reflect a holistic assessment of performance and risk management and reduce the incentive for misconduct
- Clear accountability for outcomes achieved
The new approach is built on a program of work that APRA commenced in 2015, including the APRA thematic reviews of risk culture and remuneration, the Prudential Inquiry into the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, and the results of the subsequent self-assessments of a range of large financial institutions. It also responds to recommendations from the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry and the APRA Capability Review. It will involve enhanced cooperation with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and will be enabled by additional resourcing approved by the Australian government in its 2019–2020 Budget and by a heightened regulatory appetite to intervene more forcefully, where necessary.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Insurance, Pensions, Superannuation, Securities, GCRA, Governance, Misconduct Risk, Operational Risk, Accountability Regime, Culture and Conduct, Remuneration, APRA
Previous ArticleFED Proposes to Extend Initial Compliance Dates Under SCCL Rule
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).