Featured Product

    FSB on Financial Stability Implications of AI and Machine Learning

    November 01, 2017

    FSB published a report examining the financial stability implications of the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in financial services. The report draws on discussions with firms; academic research; public and private sector reports; and ongoing work at FSB member institutions.

    The first section of the report defines the key concepts of the report and offers context for the development of AI and machine learning for financial applications. The section describes supply and demand factors driving the adoption of these techniques in financial services. The third section describes four sets of use cases: customer-focused applications; operations-focused uses; trading and portfolio management; and regulatory compliance and supervision. The fourth section contains a micro-analysis of the effects of adoption on financial markets, institutions, and consumers. The fifth section offers a macro-analysis of effects on the financial system, with the final section concluding with an assessment of implications for financial stability. The FSB analysis reveals that the following potential benefits and risks for financial stability should be monitored, as the technology is adopted in the coming years and as more data becomes available:

    • The more efficient processing of information—for example in credit decisions, financial markets, insurance contracts and customer interactions—may contribute to a more efficient financial system. The applications of AI and machine learning by regulators and supervisors can help improve regulatory compliance and increase supervisory effectiveness.
    • Applications of AI and machine learning could result in new and unexpected forms of interconnectedness between financial markets and institutions, based on the use of previously unrelated data sources by various institutions.
    • Network effects and scalability of new technologies may in the future give rise to third-party dependencies. This could in turn lead to the emergence of new systemically important players that could fall outside the regulatory perimeter.
    • The lack of interpretability or auditability of AI and machine learning methods could become a macro-level risk. Similarly, a widespread use of opaque models may result in unintended consequences.
    • As with any new product or service, it will be important to assess uses of AI and machine learning in view of their risks, including adherence to relevant protocols on data privacy, conduct risks, and cybersecurity. Adequate testing and “training” of tools with unbiased data and feedback mechanisms is important to ensure applications do what they are intended to do.

     

    Related Link: FSB Report (PDF)

    Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Fintech, Regtech, Financial Stability, FSB

    Related Articles
    News

    EIOPA Forms Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance

    EIOPA established the Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance to assist EIOPA in the development of digital responsibility principles in insurance.

    September 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes Taxonomy Changes Related to Topics 848 and 470

    FASB proposed taxonomy improvements for the proposed Accounting Standards Update on topic 848 on facilitation of effects of reference rate reform on financial reporting.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Statement on Recalculating Transitional Measures Under Solvency II

    BoE notified that it will be willing to accept applications from firms to recalculate transitional measure on technical provisions (TMTP) as at September 30, 2019.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Hosts Conference to Discuss Issues from Emergence of Stablecoins

    BIS hosted a conference in Basel to discuss policy and regulatory issues posed by the emergence of stablecoin initiatives backed by financial institutions and large technology companies.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Paper on Embedded Supervision of Blockchain-Based Financial Market

    BIS published a working paper that investigates ways to regulate and supervise blockchain-based financial markets.

    September 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Paper on Market-Implied Systemic Risk and Shadow Capital Adequacy

    BoE published a working paper that presents a forward-looking approach to measure systemic solvency risk.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Consults on Policy Module on Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process

    HKMA is consulting on the revised Supervisory Policy Manual module CA-G-5 that sets out the HKMA approach to conducting the supervisory review process under Pillar 2.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Publishes Waiver by Consent of Continuity of Access Rules

    PRA published a new waiver by consent to waive the Continuity of Access requirements contained in the Depositor Protection Part of the PRA Rulebook (DPP).

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for September 2019

    EBA updated the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool with answers to three questions.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Publishes Update on Meeting of Working Group on Risk-Free Rates

    BoE published the minutes of the July meeting of working group on sterling risk-free reference rates.

    September 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3827