Featured Product

    FSB Report Examines Sources of Regulatory Gaps on Crypto-Assets

    May 31, 2019

    FSB published a report that focuses on the regulatory and supervisory issues associated with crypto-assets. The report, which is intended for G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, offers an update on the work of BCBS, CPMI, IOSCO, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), FSB, and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The report notes that gaps may arise from the absence of international standards or recommendations and in cases where such assets are outside the perimeter of regulators. The report concludes with a recommendation that the G20 keep the topic of regulatory approaches and potential gaps, including the question of whether more coordination is needed, under review.

  • The information to be provided by a third party seeking authorization to assess the compliance of securitizations with the STS criteria provided for in Securitization Regulation should enable a competent authority to evaluate whether and, to what extent, the applicant meets the conditions of Article 28(1) of the Securitization Regulation. An authorized third party will be able to provide STS assessment services across EU. The application for authorization should, therefore, comprehensively identify that third party, any group to which this third party belongs, and the scope of its activities. With regard to the STS assessment services to be provided, the application should include the envisaged scope of the services to be provided as well as their geographical scope, particularly the following:

    • To facilitate effective use of the authorization resources of a competent authority, each application for authorization should include a table clearly identifying each submitted document and its relevance to the conditions that must be met for authorization.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the fees charged by the third party are non-discriminatory and are sufficient and appropriate to cover the costs for the provision of the STS assessment services, as required by Article 28(1)(a) of Securitization Regulation, the third party should provide comprehensive information on pricing policies, pricing criteria, fee structures, and fee schedules.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party is able to ensure the integrity and independence of the STS assessment process, that third party should provide information on the structure of those internal controls. Furthermore, the third party should provide comprehensive information on the composition of the management body and on the qualifications and repute of each of its members.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party has sufficient operational safeguards and internal processes to assess STS compliance, the third party should provide information on its procedures relating to the required qualification of its staff. The third party should also demonstrate that its STS assessment methodology is sensitive to the type of securitization and that specifies separate procedures and safeguards for asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) transactions/programs and non-ABCP securitizations.

    The use of outsourcing arrangements and a reliance on the use of external experts can raise concerns about the robustness of operational safeguards and internal processes. The application should, therefore, contain specific information about the nature and scope of any such outsourcing arrangements or use of external experts as well as the third party's governance over those arrangements. Regulation (EU) 2019/885 is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by ESMA to EC.

     

    Related Links

    Effective Date: June 18, 2019

    Press Release
  • Proposed Rule 1
  • Proposed Rule 2
  • Proposed Rule 3
  • Presentation on Regulatory Framework (PDF)
  • Presentation on Resolution Plan Rules (PDF)
  • The FSB report highlights that international organizations are monitoring and analyzing developments, setting supervisory expectations for firms, and clarifying how international standards apply to crypto-assets. However, assessing the significance of potential gaps is challenging, given the rapidly evolving nature of the crypto-asset ecosystem and related risks. It is suggested that a forward-looking approach to monitoring crypto-assets can help provide a basis for identifying potential gaps and areas that should be prioritized or focused on. The work of FSB has focused on monitoring risks to financial stability and preparing a directory of regulators on crypto-assets, which was published April 2019. The FSB assessment concluded that crypto-assets do not currently pose material risks to global financial stability, but that they do raise a number of further policy issues beyond financial stability. Moreover, FSB concluded that vigilant monitoring remains warranted, as a variety of new products and services seem to be under development. To this end, a further monitoring note will be submitted to its Standing Committee on Assessment of Vulnerabilities (SCAV) in September 2019, including developments in stablecoins and tokenization. 

    Additionally, the BCBS initiatives on crypto-assets include developing high-level supervisory expectations for banks engaged in crypto-asset activities, monitoring developments related to crypto-assets, and quantifying banks’ crypto-assets exposure. The Basel Committee is collecting data on banks’ direct and indirect exposures to crypto-assets as part of its end-2018 Basel III monitoring exercise. BCBS will discuss the results of this data collection exercise at its meeting in October 2019 and the results will inform the monitoring work of FSB. BCBS is also considering whether to formally clarify the prudential treatment of crypto-assets across the set of risk categories such as credit risk, counterparty credit risk, market risk, and liquidity risk.

    Another international standard-setter IOSCO had, in May 2018, agreed to develop an initial coin offering (ICO) support framework to assist members in dealing with the ICO-related regulatory risks. IOSCO is also examining issues and risks associated with the trading of crypto-assets on crypto-asset trading platforms and aims to publish a final report on this by the end of 2019. In addition, IOSCO´s policy committee on accounting is engaging with the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee and IASB and has encouraged the development of an appropriate accounting standard for crypto-assets. 


    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Securities, Banking, Accounting, Crypto-Assets, Financial Stability, Prudential Treatment, Regulatory Gap, FSB

    Related Articles
    News

    BIS Report Notes Existing Gaps in Climate Risk Data at Central Banks

    A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.

    July 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Multiple Regulatory Updates for Regulated Entities

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, updated version of its 5.2 filing rules document for supervisory reporting, and Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) updates in July 2022.

    July 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Consults on Prudential Standard for Operational Risk

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is seeking comments, until October 21, 2022, on the introduction of CPS 230, which is the new cross-industry prudential standard on operational risk management.

    July 28, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Amends Rule on Securitizations; ESRB Updates Reciprocation Measures

    The European Commission published a Delegated Regulation 2022/1301 on the information to be provided in accordance with the simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) notification requirements for on-balance-sheet synthetic securitizations.

    July 27, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Announces Revisions to Capital Framework for Banks

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is announced revisions to the capital framework for authorized deposit-taking institutions to implement the "unquestionably strong" capital ratios and the Basel III reforms.

    July 26, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Examines Remuneration Data and Use of Large Exposure Exemptions

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report that examines the use of certain exemptions included in the large exposures regime under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

    July 22, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    UK Authorities Publish Discussion Paper on Critical Third Parties

    The Bank of England (BoE), the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published a joint discussion paper that sets out potential measures to oversee and strengthen the resilience of services provided by critical third parties to the financial sector in UK.

    July 22, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Issues Update on Ongoing Data Transformation Program

    The Bank of England (BoE) issued a communication to firms to provide an update on the progress of the joint data transformation program—which is being led by BoE, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and the industry—for the financial sector in UK.

    July 21, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Draft Methodology and Templates for 2023 Stress Tests

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the draft methodology, templates, and template guidance for the European Union-wide stress test in 2023.

    July 21, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues SREP Guidelines and Standards for Investment Firms

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) jointly published the final guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) for investment firms.

    July 21, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8407