Vitas Vasiliauskas, who is the Chairman of the Board of the Bank of Lithuania and a member of the ECB Governing Council, spoke at the Reinventing Bretton Woods Committee conference in Washington DC about the bank's stance on the central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). He stated that "the Bank of Lithuania is part of the Eurosystem. For us, any significant step in the field of CBDCs would require action at the ECB level. For now, this seems like quite a distant prospect." However, according to him, the wholesale CBDC seems like a more viable option going forward, as opposed to the retail CBDC.
While speaking at the conference, Mr. Vasiliauskas described what a CBDC is and mentioned that a CBDC would be "fundamentally different from private crypto assets. This is because it would be- money! ... CBDCs represent one of the most intriguing and complex ideas in current discussions ... ." However, he added that the Bank of Lithuania is generally "fond of financial innovation" and has plans to open a new generation technological sandbox for testing blockchain solutions (called LBChain). Therefore, the bank does not "reject the potential that CBDCs carry. Yet at this point we remain cautious." According to him, the bank's future position in this domain will be based on a rigorous cost-benefit analysis, after considering the possible alternatives. For instance, the Bank of Lithuania already provides an effective payments infrastructure titled Centrolink. The system supports 24/7 instant payments and is accessible for all payment service operators, including fintech companies.
He concluded that, after assessing the balance between risks and benefits from the perspective of generally conservative central banks, the wholesale CBDC seems like a more viable option going forward, as opposed to the retail CBDC. "However, we feel the need to acquire a better theoretical understanding of the way any sort of CBDC would function and learn from practical pilot experiments. Notably, research and monitoring carried out by international organizations, such as the IMF or standard-setting bodies, could play an important part in finding an optimal future design."
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, Lithuania, Banking, CBDC, Crypto Assets, Distributed Ledger Technology, Wholesale CBDC, Digital Currencies, Fintech, Bank of Lithuania, BIS
Previous ArticleCBIRC Issues Rules on Equity Custody of Commercial Banks
OSFI has set out the near-term priorities for federally regulated financial institutions and federally regulated private pension plans for the coming months until March 31, 2022.
Under the Italian G20 Presidency, BIS Innovation Hub and the Italian central bank BDI launched the second edition of the G20 TechSprint on the lookout for innovative solutions to resolve operational problems in green and sustainable finance.
EBA proposed the regulatory technical standards on a central database on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in EU.
ECB published its response to the targeted EC consultation on the review of the bank crisis management and deposit insurance framework in EU.
ACPR published Version 1.0.0 of the RUBA taxonomy, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
BCBS, CPMI, and IOSCO (the Committees) are inviting entities that participate in market infrastructures and securities markets through an intermediary as well as non-bank intermediaries to complete voluntary surveys on the use of margin calls.
ECB published Decision 2021/752 to amend Decision 2019/1311 on the third series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations or TLTRO III.
The Central Bank of Ireland published Version 2.7 of the draft credit data template and rules for monthly AnaCredit reporting by banks.
OSFI proposed revisions to the Basel Capital Adequacy Reporting (BCAR) and leverage requirements returns for the 2023 reporting, with the comment period ending on July 09, 2021.
EBA published a discussion paper on review of the standardized nonperforming loans (NPL) transaction data templates, along with the proposed revised NPL data templates.