ESMA published a letter responding to IASB on the exposure draft on the phase 2 of the interest rate benchmark reform. In its letter, ESMA welcomed the IASB initiative to consider as a priority the effects of the reform of the interest rate benchmark (replacement issues) on the financial statements of entities. ESMA also published a letter to the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on the draft comment letter of EFRAG on the IASB exposure draft on phase 2 of the interest rate benchmark reform. Annex 1 to both the letters contains suggestions to improve the current draft to ensure consistency and understandability of the proposed amendments to IFRS 9.
In the response letter to IASB, ESMA supported proposals regarding additional disclosures and agrees with the proposed effective date and transition provisions, which would ensure comparability across entities and apply at the relevant period of issuers’ transition to alternative benchmark rates. It also supported the proposals to limit the scope of the amendment to the modifications arising from the interest rate benchmark reform. Additionally, ESMA agreed with the proposal to prescribe a practical expedient to account for the modification of a financial asset or liability that is required by the interest rate benchmark reform. ESMA encouraged IASB to
- clearly exclude the possibility that this amendment can be applied by analogy to circumstances other than those for which they were developed
- include, in addition to those proposed in paragraph 6.9.4, examples of modifications of a financial asset or financial liability, which would not meet the conditions described in paragraph 6.9.3 of the exposure draft
Other proposals that ESMA supported involve accounting for the amendment of the designation of qualifying hedging relationships and relate to the designation of risk components and portions. In light of the market disruption linked to the COVID-19 pandemic, ESMA recommended in the letter that IASB continue to monitor future developments of alternative rate markets to assess whether it may become necessary to extend the 24-month temporary relief period for the separately identifiable assessment, since the establishment of sufficiently liquid alternative rate markets could take longer than currently envisaged.
Keywords: International, Europe, Accounting, Banking, IFRS 9, IBOR, Interest Rate Benchmark, Disclosures, Financial Instruments, COVID-19, IASB, ESMA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleEBA Examines Impact of COVID Crisis on Banking Sector in EU
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)