HM Treasury notified that, after considering all responses, the government intends to bring forward further legislation, when the Parliamentary time allows, to address issues identified in the consultation on supporting the wind-down of critical benchmarks. The legislation will seek to reduce disruption that might arise from LIBOR transition with regard to the potential risk of contractual uncertainty and disputes in respect of contracts that have been unable to transition from LIBOR to another benchmark (tough legacy contracts), where FCA has exercised the powers given to it in the Financial Services Act.
The regulator received 32 responses to the consultation on supporting the wind-down of critical benchmarks, which ran from February 15, 2021 to March 15, 2021. The consultation invited responses on the case for additional legal protections for parties affected by the wind-down of a critical benchmark. Through the consultation, HM Treasury had intended to understand the extent to which there is uncertainty over the continued application of a critical benchmark to contracts where FCA has exercised its power to direct a change in how the benchmark is determined under the Benchmarks Regulation and the risk of associated litigation.
HM Treasury has also published its reply to the Working Group on Sterling Risk Free Reference Rates on provisions to support the wind-down of critical benchmarks. HM Treasury believes that, wherever possible, parties should seek to transition contracts away from LIBOR ahead of the end of the 2021 and the government, FCA, and BoE will continue to work closely to encourage market-led transition from LIBOR and to monitor progress.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, Critical Benchmarks, Interest Rate Benchmark, LIBOR, Benchmarks Regulation, Legacy Contracts, Benchmark Reforms, FCA, HM Treasury
Previous ArticleUK Authorities Publish Third Edition of Regulatory Initiatives Grid
Next ArticleACPR Publishes Version 1.0.0 of RUBA Taxonomy
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of Germany (BaFin) proposed to amend the “Capital Investment Conduct And Organization Ordinance” and issued a draft circular on the minimum resolvability requirements for resolution planning.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed guidelines, for the resolution authorities, on the publication of the write-down and conversion and bail-in exchange mechanic, with the comment period ending on September 07, 2022.
The Financial Services Authority of Indonesia (OJK) is strengthening cooperation with the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Japanese Financial Services Agency (JFSA)
The European Parliament and the Council published Regulation 2022/868 on European data governance (Data Governance Act).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published phase 2 of its reporting framework 3.2. The technical package supports the implementation of the updated reporting framework by providing standard specifications