General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
May 02, 2018

Ignazio Angeloni of ECB spoke about ECB Banking Supervision at the Financial Times–Fitch Global Banking Conference in London. He described the accomplishments of ECB Banking Supervision, pointed out the missing or incomplete elements, and examined the challenges and developments that lie ahead. He also elaborated on the four strategic directions that he considers to be important for ECB Banking Supervision: enhancing the quality of supervision, strengthening the focus on market risks, strengthening macro-prudential linkages, and further developing crisis management and prevention frameworks.

Regarding quality of supervision, he examined fairness, transparency, and independence as more complex requirements that are particularly necessary for an international organization. He noted the factors that suggest that some supervisory attention should be redirected onto market risks. He stated that the expected normalization of interest rates is already accompanied by higher volatility in the financial markets. Recent ECB analysis of interest rate risk in the banking book has revealed that internal models tend to be based solely on a period of decreasing interest rates. Some banks are still burdened by precrisis exposures, unprofitable, and illiquid. Another factor is Brexit, which will be a game changer with respect to the mix of business models in the euro area. Increased competition and the prospective launch of a Capital Markets Union in the EU will force euro area banks to rethink their own traditional models as well.

He further mentioned that, in the 2016 EU-wide stress test, market risks were a component of the overall short-term capital impact under the adverse scenario. Market risks in banking and trading books should be captured more systematically in stress tests and other supervisory analysis. ECB Banking Supervision should also find ways to improve its linkage with macro-prudential policy. The legal framework sets certain boundaries and modalities for this to happen. The Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) Regulation of 2013 established ECB as a macro-prudential authority, but only for a limited set of instruments covered by EU law (risk weights on certain exposures, liquidity requirements, own funds, and capital buffers). Borrower-based measures, such as loan-to-value and loan-to-deposit ratio caps, often recognized as having a greater impact, remain with national authorities. For the instruments set out in EU law, ECB can only tighten the policy stance—a decision that ECB has so far never taken. Coordination among stakeholders involves complex and cumbersome notification and consultation procedures. EC has recently reviewed the framework and sent to the other European legislators (Council and Parliament) a proposal broadly confirming the existing approach. This does not prevent ECB from engaging further in a number of areas.

He mentioned that the crisis management framework of the Banking Union has performed adequately: the few cases of bank failures were addressed smoothly, without disruptions or contagion. However, two areas need to be flagged for further improvement. One pertains to regulation, the other to supervision. On the regulatory side, state aid and resolution arrangements issued at different times may lead to contradictory outcomes. On the supervisory side, experience highlights the importance of conduct risks as potential triggers of bank crises. Money laundering has recently come to the fore. National anti-money laundering frameworks are not harmonized across the EU and their remits are not aligned with prudential supervision. A European authority for combating money laundering, distinct from but actively cooperating with the ECB supervision, remains the desirable goal in the medium term. In conclusion, he highlighted that “The first five years of ECB Banking Supervision are coming to an end; that offers us an opportunity to review our performance and, potentially, to plan for new directions to explore in future. The advent of ECB Banking Supervision marked a quantum leap forward in the quality of banking supervision on the Continent ... ."

 

Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Supervision, Market Risk, Macro-prudential Policy, Crisis Management Framework, Stress Testing, ECB

Related Articles
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Fourth Update for March 2019

EBA published answers to five questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

March 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ECB Updates Validation Checks and List of Identifiers Under AnaCredit

ECB updated the AnaCredit validation checks (Version 1.4) and the list of national identifiers (version 2.4) for AnaCredit reporting.

March 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Publishes Results of the Basel III Monitoring Exercise

BCBS published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on data as of June 30, 2018.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA, FCA, and PRA Agree on MoU Template for Supervisory Cooperation

EBA, FCA, and PRA announced that they have agreed on a template for the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that sets out the expectations for supervisory cooperation and information-sharing arrangements between UK and EU/European Economic Area national authorities.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Publishes CoP on Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements of Banks

HKMA issued, in relation to the Financial Institutions Resolution (Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements—Banking Sector) Rules (LAC Rules) a chapter of a code of practice (LAC CoP) under section 196 of the Financial Institutions Resolution Ordinance (FIRO).

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Publishes Reports Monitoring the Implementation of Basel III in EU

EBA published two reports measuring the impact of implementing the final Basel III reforms and monitoring the implementation of liquidity measures in EU.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Publishes Results of Survey on Proportionality in Bank Regulation

BCBS published a report presenting the results of a survey conducted on proportionality practices in bank regulation and supervision.

March 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Adopt Interim Rule to Facilitate Transfers of Legacy Swaps

US Agencies (FCA, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) are adopting and inviting comments on an interim final rule.

March 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Updates List of Other Systemically Important Institutions in EU

EBA updated the 2018 list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU. The list also reflects the additional capital buffers that the relevant authorities have set for the identified O-SIIs.

March 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Expects Banks to Manage Risks Related to Crypto-Asset Exposures

HKMA issued a statement announcing that it expects authorized institutions to take note of the BCBS statement on crypto-assets and its prudential expectations.

March 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2780