General Information & Client Services
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
May 02, 2018

Ignazio Angeloni of ECB spoke about ECB Banking Supervision at the Financial Times–Fitch Global Banking Conference in London. He described the accomplishments of ECB Banking Supervision, pointed out the missing or incomplete elements, and examined the challenges and developments that lie ahead. He also elaborated on the four strategic directions that he considers to be important for ECB Banking Supervision: enhancing the quality of supervision, strengthening the focus on market risks, strengthening macro-prudential linkages, and further developing crisis management and prevention frameworks.

Regarding quality of supervision, he examined fairness, transparency, and independence as more complex requirements that are particularly necessary for an international organization. He noted the factors that suggest that some supervisory attention should be redirected onto market risks. He stated that the expected normalization of interest rates is already accompanied by higher volatility in the financial markets. Recent ECB analysis of interest rate risk in the banking book has revealed that internal models tend to be based solely on a period of decreasing interest rates. Some banks are still burdened by precrisis exposures, unprofitable, and illiquid. Another factor is Brexit, which will be a game changer with respect to the mix of business models in the euro area. Increased competition and the prospective launch of a Capital Markets Union in the EU will force euro area banks to rethink their own traditional models as well.

He further mentioned that, in the 2016 EU-wide stress test, market risks were a component of the overall short-term capital impact under the adverse scenario. Market risks in banking and trading books should be captured more systematically in stress tests and other supervisory analysis. ECB Banking Supervision should also find ways to improve its linkage with macro-prudential policy. The legal framework sets certain boundaries and modalities for this to happen. The Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) Regulation of 2013 established ECB as a macro-prudential authority, but only for a limited set of instruments covered by EU law (risk weights on certain exposures, liquidity requirements, own funds, and capital buffers). Borrower-based measures, such as loan-to-value and loan-to-deposit ratio caps, often recognized as having a greater impact, remain with national authorities. For the instruments set out in EU law, ECB can only tighten the policy stance—a decision that ECB has so far never taken. Coordination among stakeholders involves complex and cumbersome notification and consultation procedures. EC has recently reviewed the framework and sent to the other European legislators (Council and Parliament) a proposal broadly confirming the existing approach. This does not prevent ECB from engaging further in a number of areas.

He mentioned that the crisis management framework of the Banking Union has performed adequately: the few cases of bank failures were addressed smoothly, without disruptions or contagion. However, two areas need to be flagged for further improvement. One pertains to regulation, the other to supervision. On the regulatory side, state aid and resolution arrangements issued at different times may lead to contradictory outcomes. On the supervisory side, experience highlights the importance of conduct risks as potential triggers of bank crises. Money laundering has recently come to the fore. National anti-money laundering frameworks are not harmonized across the EU and their remits are not aligned with prudential supervision. A European authority for combating money laundering, distinct from but actively cooperating with the ECB supervision, remains the desirable goal in the medium term. In conclusion, he highlighted that “The first five years of ECB Banking Supervision are coming to an end; that offers us an opportunity to review our performance and, potentially, to plan for new directions to explore in future. The advent of ECB Banking Supervision marked a quantum leap forward in the quality of banking supervision on the Continent ... ."


Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Supervision, Market Risk, Macro-prudential Policy, Crisis Management Framework, Stress Testing, ECB

Related Insights

FSB Publishes the G-SIB List for 2018

FSB published the 2018 list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) using end-2017 data and an assessment methodology designed by BCBS.

November 16, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Publishes Additional Information on the 2018 G-SIB Assessment

BCBS published further information related to the 2018 assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), including additional details to help understand the scoring methodology.

November 16, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

CBB Proposes and Finalizes Rulebook Modules for Banks in November 2018

CBB announced the issuance of new leverage ratio requirements under Module CA (Part 3) for Islamic (Chapter CA-10) and conventional bank licensees (Chapter CA-15).

November 15, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

OFR on Financial Stability Risks in Its 2018 Annual Report to Congress

OFR released its 2018 Annual Report to Congress, which examines risks to the financial stability in the United States.

November 15, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

SRB Sets Expectations on Resolvability of Banks in Context of Brexit

SRB published a position paper that presents its expectations about ensuring resolvability of banks in the context of Brexit.

November 15, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Publishes Final Policy on Capital Framework for Securitization

PRA published the policy statement PS29/18, which provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP12/18 on the new EU framework and significant risk transfer for securitization.

November 15, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

IAIS Publishes Drafts of Revised ICP 8, ICP 15, ICP 16, and ICP 20

IAIS published the drafts of revised Insurance Core Principles on Public Disclosure (ICP 20), Investments (ICP 15), Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes (ICP 16), and Risk Management and Internal Controls (ICP 8), along with a revised draft of the glossary on enterprise risk management (ERM).

November 14, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Updates Final Policy and Reporting Form for Leverage Ratio in UK

PRA published the Policy Statement PS28/18, which provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP14/18 titled "UK leverage ratio: Applying the framework to systemic ring-fenced bodies and reflecting the systemic risk buffer."

November 14, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

IASB Could Extend Effective Date for IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 for Insurers

IASB has voted to propose a one-year deferral—to 2022—of the effective date for the new insurance contracts standard IFRS 17. IASB also decided to propose extending to 2022 the temporary exemption for insurers to apply the financial instruments standard IFRS 9.

November 14, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

MAS Amends Notice 637 on Capital Adequacy Requirements in Singapore

MAS published the final, revised Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements in Singapore.

November 13, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2219