MAS published an information paper on incentive structures in the banking industry. MAS has been intensifying the supervisory focus on financial institutions’ culture and conduct. As part of these efforts, MAS conducted a series of thematic inspections on incentive structures of selected banks in 2018, recognizing the fundamental role of incentives in influencing behavior and outcomes. The focus of MAS on incentive structures is intended to ensure that bank practices promote ethical behavior, which considers customer interests and prudent risk-taking for long-term financial soundness, to achieve a healthy organizational culture.
The inspections covered incentive structures of front office staff in the Private Banking, Global Markets, and Corporate Banking businesses. They included assessments of the banks’ governance over, and frameworks and policies for, performance evaluation, remuneration, and consequence management and whether these were aligned with the FSB Principles and Standards for Sound Compensation Practices. MAS also held industry roundtable and townhall events in 2019 to share observations and exchange views with the industry following the thematic inspections. This paper sets out several desired outcomes for incentive structures that MAS expects to see in banks. In particular:
- Performance evaluation of staff takes into consideration both the “what” (ability to meet financial targets) and the “how” (how these targets are achieved). There is a systematic framework to assess and align staff’s behavior and conduct with the values espoused by the organization and to send a strong signal on the importance of ethical conduct vis-à-vis financial targets.
- Remuneration frameworks adequately consider behavioral and conduct factors, in addition to financial targets. In other words, staff’s behavior and conduct have a strong and "impactful" influence on their remuneration.
- Ethical behavior that considers customer interests and demonstrates prudent-risk taking is actively promoted and celebrated. Concurrently, there are clear frameworks and processes to deter staff from, and hold them accountable for, misconduct through disciplinary actions and compensation adjustments.
MAS expects banks to benchmark themselves against the desired outcomes set out in the paper. Banks should assess the ability of its internal controls and processes to achieve these outcomes effectively and take steps in a risk-appropriate manner to address gaps, if any. Banks have the latitude to explore different means of achieving the desired outcomes, taking into account their specific organizational structure, business model, and risk profile. In addition, while this information paper is based on the MAS’s thematic inspections of banks, the desired outcomes and good practices are relevant and applicable to insurance companies as well. Insurance companies should, therefore, incorporate lessons from this paper in a risk-based and proportionate manner, giving proper regard to the profile of their business activities and customers.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Banking, Insurance, Incentive Structures, Corporate Governance, Proportionality, Conduct Risk, Remuneration, Operational Risk, MAS
Previous ArticleFED Publishes Additional Information on Stress Testing Program
PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.
EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.
EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.
PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.
MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.
APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.
EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.
SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.