EBA published an opinion on the deposit protection issues stemming from the withdrawal of the UK from the EU. The opinion is addressed to the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Designated Authorities (DGSDAs) and is intended to ensure that depositors in the branches of the UK credit institutions in the EU are adequately protected by the EU deposit guarantee schemes (DGSs), in case of a no-deal Brexit.
No-deal Brexit may affect branches of UK credit institutions in EU, depending on the post-Brexit decisions taken by the UK authorities on the potential exclusion of these branches from the scope of the UK depositor protection scheme. EBA believes that the EU DGSDAs need to take active steps to ensure that deposits in such branches operating in the EU continue to be adequately protected after Brexit. To ensure that covered deposits are protected, EBA recommends that the branches become members of local EU DGSs. Additionally, EBA explains when, how, and by whom the depositors should be informed about any potential changes to the protection of their deposits. The opinion highlights to the DGSDAs the potential issues stemming from depositors in branches of EU credit institutions operating in the UK potentially being covered by both the UK and the EU DGSs.
Related Links: Press Release
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, Brexit, Deposit Guarantee Schemes, DGSDA, EBA
Previous ArticleBIRD Initiative of ESCB Publishes Documentation on BIRD Release 3.0
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.