MFSA Clarifies Whether SaaS Cloud Model is an Outsourcing Arrangement
MFSA published a circular clarifying whether the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) cloud model is an outsourcing arrangement. The circular also provides brief guidance on how license holders shall manage the relevant outsourcing risks associated with SaaS arrangements, including but not limited to risks associated with the data being processed by the SaaS third-party providers. MFSA states that license holders need to, for instance, give due consideration to business continuity in case of disruptions on the part of the SaaS third-party providers, including migration and exit strategies. The circular also states that SaaS third-party providers should be subject to adequate due diligence both at the initial stage and on an ongoing basis.
The MFSA circular presents the definition of (verbatim) SaaS as stated in the EC cloud strategy from May 2019 and the differing definition of ICT third-party provider as stated under the proposed Regulation on Digital Operational Resilience. Within the context of the vendor-user relationship, the SaaS model allows the vendor to manage the business application(s) that would otherwise have to be managed in-house. With respect to establishing whether SaaS is an outsourcing arrangement, the circular states that, under normal circumstances, the management element of the service rendered by SaaS third-party providers to license holders qualifies as an outsourcing arrangement. SaaS qualifies as an outsourcing arrangement if the service is performed on a recurrent or an ongoing basis and if the service would normally fall within the scope of functions that would or could realistically be performed by the license holder, even if the license holder has not performed this function in the past. License holders are to assess and determine whether SaaS currently being consumed or planned to be acquired, qualifies as an outsourcing arrangement. License holders are to further assess and determine whether the outsourcing arrangement entails the outsourcing of a critical or important function.
Additional guidance on outsourcing risk and on whether certain arrangements quality as outsourcing can be found within the MFSA Guidance on Technology Arrangements ICT and Security Risk Management and Outsourcing Arrangements and on the guidelines of ESAs on outsourcing arrangements and/or outsourcing to cloud service providers. License holders are reminded of their obligation to comply with any applicable Acts, Regulations, rules, and sector-specific guidelines pertaining to outsourcing arrangements.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, Malta, Banking, SAAS, Cloud Computing, Outsourcing Risk, Operational Resilience, Third-Party Arrangements, MFSA
Previous Article
IFRS Sets Out Strategic Direction for Sustainability Standards BoardNext Article
MNB Revises Principles for Setting MREL for BanksRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
