BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community. The paper leverages on a survey conducted in 2020 with responses from 52 central banks worldwide. The paper examines how central banks define and use big data, as well as which opportunities and challenges they see. Institutions use big data and machine learning for economic research, in the areas of financial stability and monetary policy, as well as for suptech and regtech applications. Data quality, sampling, and representativeness are major challenges for central banks and so is legal uncertainty around data privacy and confidentiality. The paper notes that cooperation among public authorities could improve central banks’ ability to collect, store, and analyze big data.
Among other challenges, several institutions report constraints in setting up an adequate IT infrastructure and in developing the necessary human capital. Overall, the analysis highlights that central banks define big data in an encompassing way that includes unstructured non-traditional as well as structured data sets. Central banks' interest in big data and machine learning has markedly increased over the last years. In 2020, over 80% of central banks report that they use big data, up from just 30% five years ago. Among the institutions that currently use big data, over 70% use it for economic research, while 40% state that they use it to inform policy decisions. These numbers suggest that big data and machine learning offer many useful applications and can help central banks in fulfilling their mandate. The vast majority of central banks are now conducting projects that involve big data and the central banks are willing to join forces to reap the benefits of big data. Indeed, half of them reported an interest in collaborating in one or more specific project, with three types of cooperation envisaged:
- By sharing knowledge among those institutions that have developed specific expertise that can be reused in other jurisdictions. These expertise include general big data techniques (for example, data visualization, network analysis, machine learning tools), more general information management issues (for example, development of open-source coding, data-sharing protocols, encryption and anonymization techniques for using confidential data) as well as specific applications that are more devoted to the central bank community (for example, suptech and regtech areas).
- By using big data to work on global issues such as international spillovers, global value chains, and cross-border payments.
- By developing joint exploratory projects to benefit from economies of scale and collectively share (limited) financial and human resources.
International financial institutions can greatly support these cooperative approaches. They can facilitate innovation by promoting technological solutions to harmonize data standards and processes among jurisdictions. With this spirit, the BIS Innovation Hub has been established to identify and develop insights into critical trends in financial technology of relevance to central banks, explore the development of public goods to enhance the functioning of the global financial system, and serve as a focal point for a network of central bank experts on innovation. Such a network could undoubtedly play an important role in facilitating international cooperation to exploit big data sources and techniques.
Keywords: International, Banking, Big Data, Regtech, Suptech, Machine Learning, BIS
Previous ArticleBCB Establishes Committee to Oversee Regulatory Sandbox Operations
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.