IMF published a report on the assessment of financial sector in Romania, under the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP). IMF also published technical notes on crisis preparedness, systemic risk analysis and stress testing the financial sector, macro-prudential policy framework and tools, balance sheet analysis, and calibration of a debt-service-to-income (DSTI) limit in Romania.
The financial sector assessment reveals that the financial sector in Romania has strengthened significantly over the last few years. Effective supervisory measures have helped reduce the high level of nonperforming loans (NPLs) from 21.9% at its peak in 2013 to 6.4% as of December 2017. Foreign-owned banks’ dependence on parent funding has significantly declined, while deposits from the domestic private sector have increased, reducing liquidity risks. Banks’ capital buffers strengthened, on the back of a slowdown of credit and low interest rates, with an average capital to risk-weighted assets now above 18%. However, some vulnerabilities are emerging. Lending practices of nonbank financial lenders (NBFLs) may lead to loan defaults and reputational risks for the banking sector. As the financial system is small, shocks may further discourage financial intermediation, which is already among the lowest in EU.
Stress test results indicate that, over a three-year horizon, banks face losses of close to 900 basis points (bps) in capital, resulting from trading losses on their sovereign securities portfolios, and credit losses on their loan portfolios. A number of the 12 stressed banks fail to meet the minimum threshold for the common equity tier 1 capital ratio. Policy action is needed to address these risks and strengthen financial stability. The authorities are already contemplating a debt-service-to-income (DSTI) limit on mortgages and calibration of this limit could draw on the mission’s analysis of loan-level information from the Romanian credit register. In addition, the team recommends a currency-differentiated liquidity coverage ratio and the monitoring of a currency-differentiated net stable funding ratio, to limit FX liquidity risks. Strengthened monitoring of NBFLs is warranted to avoid reputational risks and regulatory arbitrage. The mission also recommends introducing capital buffers to increase resilience and guard against risks from large sovereign exposures.
The National Bank of Romania (NBR) is transitioning to a risk-based supervisory approach that needs further enhancements. The new Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) Guidelines of EBA are still in the initial stages of implementation. NBR should conduct more risk-focused, banking industry-wide thematic analyses and develop its off-site monitoring tools, such as by conducting bottom up stress tests. The NBR should also build up specialized expertise, in particular in IT and cyber security. This will benefit the systemically important payment and securities settlement systems that are being brought under the roof of the NBR. Finally, remaining gaps in the anit-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) framework should be addressed. The upgrade of crisis management and resolution procedures that is underway should continue. Important progress has been made, in particular through the adoption and implementation of the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD). Finally, the FSAP recommended the adoption of a comprehensive strategy for financial development.
- FSAP Report
- Technical Note on Crisis Preparedness
- Technical Note on Stress Testing the Sector
- Technical Note on Macro-Prudential Policy Framework
- Technical Note on Balance Sheet Analysis
- Technical Note on Calibration of DSTI Limit
Keywords: Europe, Romania, Banking, Insurance, Stress Testing, FSAP, Macro-prudential Policy, IMF
Previous ArticleFASB Improves Implementation of the Leases Standard in US
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.