IMF published the concluding statement of the 2017 Article IV Mission in Japan. The key topics covered in this concluding statement are recent economic developments and policies, outlooks, risks, structural reforms, and policies to safeguard financial stability in Japan.
Enhanced financial oversight frameworks would help contain emerging risks. Internal processes need to be further developed to support full risk-based prudential supervision, and corporate governance needs to be strengthened across the banking and insurance sectors. Moreover, capital requirements need to be more tailored to individual bank risk profiles. Further steps should be taken to implement an economic-value-based solvency regime for the insurance sector, as certainty about the future regime would help companies to adjust their business and investment strategies. The macro-prudential framework could be further strengthened by clarifying the mandate of the Council for Cooperation on Financial Stability and proactively expanding the macro-prudential toolkit.
The crisis management and resolution framework could be strengthened further. The complexity of the framework and ambiguities regarding the circumstances under which different regimes of the framework would be used, could prove challenging for implementation, and may thereby fuel expectations of public support. Further steps to ensure that supervisory powers are deployed without delay should be embedded more firmly in the authorities’ framework for early intervention. Expansion of the resolution toolkit, enhancement and clarification of the legal framework (including its extension to central counterparties), and improvements in operational aspects would improve authorities’ readiness and help steer market expectations and incentives. The authorities are encouraged to further engage with bank boards and senior management to ensure banks fully understand the implications of underlying trends for future viability, and act promptly to facilitate the exit of unviable firms. They are also encouraged to facilitate the transition of regional banks to higher fee-based income.
The concluding statement describes the preliminary findings of IMF staff at the end of an official staff visit, in most cases to a member country. The views in this statement also reflect the findings of the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), which was conducted by the IMF during September 2016-April 2017. Countries with financial sectors that are considered systemically important, such as Japan, must undertake a mandatory stability assessment every five years.
Related Link: Concluding Statement
Keywords: Asia Pacific, IMF, Japan, Insurance, Banking, Financial Stability, Article IV, FSAP
Previous ArticleEBA-US Agencies Conclude Cooperation Arrangement on Bank Resolution
Next ArticleIOSCO Publishes Final Report on Other CRA Products
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.