July 18, 2018

Ms Beverly Hirtle of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York spoke at the conference on "The Effects of Post-Crisis Banking Reforms" in New York City. She discussed the current supervisory stress testing regime and assessed whether it continues to address the macro-prudential objectives. For this discussion, she used the six elements that she and her co-authors argued, in a paper, made the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP) a successful macro-prudential exercise. These six elements are comprehensiveness; consistency; multiple, independent estimates; diverse perspectives; transparency of process and results; and clear and predictable goals and actions.

Referring to the recent passage of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCP Act), she said that many banks will no longer be subject to DFAST supervisory stress testing or could participate only on a periodic basis. Whether the set of banks that continue to be subject to the annual DFAST supervisory stress testing represents a large enough share of the overall banking industry and sufficiently spans the range of banking activities to provide a comprehensive perspective is something that merits monitoring and analysis, said Ms. Hirtle. She also mentioned that their paper argued that the financial crisis environment gave the SCAP a very clear goal of providing confidence that the banking system could continue to lend even under more dire economic conditions, as a way of mitigating the chance that those dire economic conditions actually materialized. In that sense, the SCAP was very much a "lean into the wind" macro-prudential exercise.

However, in the current environment, she would argue that the goals of the supervisory stress testing regime are more diffuse. There are clearly micro-prudential "safety and soundness" objectives related to sound capital planning, risk identification, and capital adequacy at each of the firms participating in the exercise.  These are critically important objectives. According to her: “What is less clear to me is what role cyclical macro-prudential concerns play in the evolving stress testing regime. Clearly, the design of the stress test scenarios, which embed a number of counter-cyclical features, is an important channel for "lean against the wind" or "lean into the wind" efforts. However, narrowing the set of firms subject to DFAST supervisory stress testing potentially pushes away from the broader cyclical perspective. Less of the banking industry will be covered by the stress tests and assessments of the strength of the industry will be based on a smaller part of the whole.“

She believes that ensuring that the largest and most systemically important banks do robust capital and liquidity planning, have strong internal controls, do good risk identification, and have very healthy amounts of capital (especially common equity) and liquidity resources is fundamental to fostering a stable banking system that can perform its critical financial intermediation role in both calm and stressed economic environments. “What I hoped to do today is simply to point out that one of the key objectives of the original SCAP stress program—leaning into the wind during a severe economic downturn—might be getting less emphasis as the time since the financial crisis grows, the economic expansion continues, and the supervisory stress testing regime evolves,” said Ms. Hirtle.

 

Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Stress Testing, DFAST, EGRRCP Act, SCAP, BIS

Related Articles
News

BIS Report Discusses Regulatory Issues Related to Big Techs in Finance

BIS has pre-released a chapter of the BIS Annual Economic Report; this chapter focuses on the risks and opportunities presented by large technology firms (big techs) in the financial services sector.

June 23, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IOSCO Report Examines Liquidity in Corporate Bond Markets

IOSCO published a report that examines the factors affecting liquidity, under stressed conditions, in the secondary corporate bond markets.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Publishes Results of the 2019 Stress Tests for Banks

FED published a report presenting results of the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) exercise for 2019.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Report Examines Global Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Practices

BCBS published a report that examines the Pillar 2 supervisory review practices and approaches in Basel member jurisdictions.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IASB Publishes Work Plan and Meeting Updates for June 2019

IASB published an updated work plan and a summary of its June meeting, which presents preliminary decisions of the Board.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Publishes Banking Exposure Limits Code Under Banking Ordinance

HKMA issued a circular to all authorized institutions informing that the Banking (Exposure Limits) Code has been published in the Gazette on June 21, 2019.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OSFI Proposes Guideline on Internal Model Oversight for Insurers

OSFI proposed the draft guideline E-25 on the internal model oversight framework for federally regulated property and casualty (P&C) insurance companies.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for June 2019

Under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week, EBA published one answer regarding the calculation of institution-specific countercyclical capital buffer rates.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Publishes Summary of the Meeting in June 2019

BCBS published a summary of its June meeting in Basel.

June 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OCC Bulletin on Risk Management Guidance for Home Mortgage Lending

OCC published Bulletin 2019-28 on risk management guidance for higher-loan-to-value (LTV) lending activities in communities targeted for revitalization.

June 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3298