EC adopted a communication to help national authorities and other stakeholders prepare for changes that will arise at the end of the transition period. The communication sets out a sector-by-sector overview (included the financial sector) of the main areas with changes, regardless of the outcome of the ongoing EU-UK negotiations. The communication also sets out measures that national authorities and other stakeholders should take to be ready for these changes. In parallel, EC is reviewing and, where necessary, updating all 102 stakeholder notices, published at the time of the withdrawal negotiations—many of which continue to be relevant for the end of the transition period. The Annex to the communication contains a list of more than 50 updated notices, all of which are available on the dedicated webpage of EC.
As of January 01, 2021, authorizations to provide services from UK across the EU will stop applying. The provision of financial services from UK to EU will be possible subject to the relevant third-country rules of the member state concerned. Under the equivalence frameworks foreseen in certain Union legal acts, EU has the possibility to facilitate specific interactions between the Union and UK financial systems by recognizing that the relevant UK regulatory and supervisory regimes are equivalent to the corresponding Union legislation and requirements. Only a limited number of these equivalences allow third-country firms to provide their services to EU clients. Specifically for investment firms, a new, improved equivalence framework will enter into force in mid-2021. In most areas, such as insurance, commercial bank lending, and deposit-taking, equivalence does not allow third-country firms to provide services in EU but provides prudential and/or reporting relief to EU firms. As the EU equivalence frameworks are unilateral, neither the equivalence assessments nor possible decisions for granting equivalence are part of the negotiations with UK.
The Political Declaration on the future relationship states that both EU and UK will endeavor to conclude their respective equivalence assessments before the end of June 2020. EC has shared with UK the questionnaires covering 28 equivalence areas. Until the end of June, only four completed questionnaires had been returned. On this basis, EC could not conclude its equivalence assessments by the end of June and will continue the assessments based on further replies that it is receiving. EC will take decisions based on a comprehensive assessment and considering the EU interest. In a number of areas, EC has not initiated an assessment, either because equivalence decisions have already been granted or because, for instance, the EU legal framework is not yet fully in place. With regard to the latter areas, EC will not adopt an equivalence decision in the short or medium term.
In the short term, and to address the possible risks to financial stability, EC is considering the adoption of a time-limited equivalence decision for UK in the area of central clearing counterparties (CCPs) of derivatives. Such a time-limited decision would allow EU-based CCPs to further develop their capacity to clear relevant trades in the short and medium term and EU clearing members to take and implement the necessary steps, including by reducing their systemic exposure to UK market infrastructures. EC is adopting the implementing measures that will determine the degree of systemic risk of third-country CCPs and the necessary measures to strengthen the supervision of such CCPs, with the possible need for further measures to mitigate those risks. As a next step, EC will work closely with national authorities, businesses, and other stakeholders over the coming months to help them prepare for the far-reaching changes that will occur at the end of the year, irrespective of whether an agreement is reached.
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Brexit, Transition Period, Equivalence Regime, Derivatives, Third-Country CCPs, EC
Previous ArticleAPRA Updates Regulatory Approach to Loan Deferrals Amid COVID Crisis
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.