Featured Product

    ACPR Seeks Views on Governance of Artificial Intelligence in Finance

    July 09, 2020

    ACPR published a discussion paper on the governance of artificial intelligence in finance. In this paper, ACPR has proposed four principles for evaluating artificial intelligence algorithms and tools—namely, data management, performance, stability, and explainability. ACPR also recommends the governance concerns that need to be taken into account, as early as the design phase of an algorithm. These concerns involve the integration of artificial intelligence into traditional business processes; the impact of this integration on internal controls; the relevance of outsourcing (partially or fully) the design or maintenance phases; and the internal and external audit functions. The comment period for this discussion paper ends on September 04, 2020.

    The governance of artificial intelligence algorithms requires careful consideration of the validation of each decision-making process. The regulatory compliance and the performance objectives of these algorithms are only achievable through a certain level of explainability and traceability. In the discussion paper, ACPR recommends focus on the following aspects of governance concerns:

    • Integration of artificial intelligence into business processes. This involves ascertaining whether the artificial intelligence component fulfills a critical function, by dint of its operational role or of the associated compliance risk and whether the engineering process follows a well-defined methodology throughout the machine learning lifecycle (from algorithmic design to monitoring in production), in the sense of reproducibility, quality assurance, architectural design, auditability, and automation.
    • Human-algorithm interactions. Those can require a particular kind of explainability, intended either for internal operators who need to confirm or reject an algorithm’s output, or for customers who are entitled to understand the decisions impacting them or the commercial offers made to them. Besides, processes involving artificial intelligence often leave room for human intervention, which is beneficial or even necessary, but also bears new risks. Such new risks include the introduction of biases into the explanation of an 4 algorithm’s output, or a stronger feeling of engaging one’s responsibility when contradicting the algorithm than when confirming its decisions.
    • Security and outsourcing. Machine learning models are exposed to new kinds of attacks. Furthermore, strategies such as development outsourcing, skills outsourcing, and external hosting should undergo careful risk assessment. More generally, third-party risks should be evaluated.
    • Initial and continuous validation process. This process must often be re-examined when designing an artificial intelligence algorithm intended for augmenting or altering an existing process. For instance, the governance framework applicable to a business line may in some cases be maintained, while, in other cases, it will have to be updated before putting the artificial intelligence component into production. Continuous validation process. The continuous monitoring of machine learning algorithm, for instance, requires technical expertise and machine-learning-specific tools to ensure the aforementioned principles are followed over time (appropriate data management, predictive accuracy, stability, and availability of valid explanations).
    • Audit. For internal and external audits of artificial-intelligence-based systems in finance, exploratory work led by the ACPR suggests adopting a dual approach. The first facet combines analysis of the source code and data with methods for documenting artificial intelligence algorithms, predictive, models and datasets. The second facet leverages methods providing explanation for an individual decision or for the overall behavior of the algorithm; it also relies on two techniques for testing an algorithm as a black box: challenger models (to compare against the model under test) and benchmarking datasets, both curated by the auditor.  

     

    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: September 04, 2020

    Keywords: Europe, France, Banking, Insurance, Governance, Artificial Intelligence, Fintech, Machine Learning, Regtech, Outsourcing Arrangements, ACPR

    Related Articles
    News

    HM Treasury Publishes Policy Statement Amending Benchmarks Regulation

    HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.

    October 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Consults on Implementation of Certain Provisions of CRD5 and CRR2

    PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).

    October 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Finalize Rule to Reduce Impact of Large Bank Failures

    US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).

    October 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Finalize Rule on Net Stable Funding Ratio Requirements

    US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.

    October 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Sets Out Effective Practices for Cyber Incident Recovery

    FSB finalized the toolkit of effective practices to assist financial institutions in their cyber incident response and recovery activities.

    October 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Publishes Eleventh Issue of the Macroprudential Bulletin

    ECB published eleventh issue of the Macroprudential Bulletin, which provides insight into the ongoing work of ECB in the field of macro-prudential policy.

    October 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HM Treasury Seeks Views on Review of Solvency II Regime for Insurers

    HM Treasury issued a call for evidence seeking views to reform the prudential regulatory regime—also known as Solvency II—of the insurance sector in UK.

    October 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESRB Responds to EC Consultation on Review of Solvency II

    ESRB responded to the EC consultation on review of Solvency II regime.

    October 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HM Treasury Consults on Phase II of Future Regulatory Framework Review

    HM Treasury launched a consultation on Phase II of the Future Regulatory Framework Review, with the comment period ending on January 19, 2021.

    October 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Publishes Work Program for 2021

    EC adopted the work program for 2021.

    October 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5991