GLEIF published the monthly Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) data quality report for June 2019, which analyzes the overall data quality in the Global LEI System. In this edition, the analysis of distinct quality maturity levels met by the LEI issuers demonstrated improvements. Twenty-nine out of 33 LEI issuers achieved the required data quality and the total Data Quality Score remained stable above 99%.
The Data Quality criteria is expected to contain 12 dimensions. At present, a subset of 11 criteria is implemented, to the detriment of the score, as they are averaged on all of them. This is expected to change, on a non-fixed timeline, to include all 12 dimensions. The report covers the following factors:
- The LEI Total Data Quality Score for the reporting period
- Progress achieved with regard to the continuous optimization of the data quality within the Global LEI System, based on the LEI Total Data Quality Score
- The Total Data Quality Score per country achieved in the reporting period
- Results of GLEIF checks of the LEI data records against implemented quality criteria—that is, the percentage of records that successfully passed the tests
- The percentage of LEI data records, which meet the requirements of distinct quality maturity levels
- Information on "Level 2" data, duplicates and challenges for the reporting period
- The section "Top 5 Failing Checks" identifying data quality checks performed by GLEIF that trigger the highest number of LEI records that fail these checks. In the report, the type of data quality check is indicated with a number.
Keywords: International, Banking, LEI, GLEIS, Data Quality, GLEIF
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.