ESMA issued an opinion with the interim transparency calculations for non-equity instruments in relation to the implementation of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and Regulation (MiFID II/MiFIR). These calculations specify the transparency regime applicable to trading in secondary markets from January 03, 2018, when MiFID II will enter into force. ESMA also published the frequently asked questions, or FAQ, on MiFID II—Interim Transparency Calculations.
Therefore, ESMA is publishing information on the liquidity classification of financial instruments and the sizes of large in scale (LIS) compared to normal market size and the size specific to the instrument (SSTI). ESMA issued these transparency calculations for all non-equity instruments, except for bonds, which have been classified as liquid, in accordance with the MIFID/MIFIR regulatory standards on transparency requirements. The transparency calculations are based on data submitted by EU trading venues. The publication of LIS and STTI thresholds per bond type, which had been planned for July 03, 2017, has been delayed, as ESMA needs to perform an additional quality review of the information submitted by third parties for this exercise. These interim calculations for bonds will now be published in August 2017.
MiFID II introduces transparency requirements for bonds, structured finance products, emission allowances, and derivatives, with powers for national competent authorities to waive or defer the transparency obligations if instruments do not have a liquid market or if an order or transaction exceeds a certain size.
Keywords: Europe, ESMA, Securities, MiFID II, MiFIR, Transparency Calculations, Transparency Requirements
Previous ArticleHKMA Updates List of Banks Designated as D-SIBs in Hong Kong
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.
PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.
PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).