While speaking at the Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance annual conference, Christopher Woolard of FCA examined the ongoing work in regulation of crypto-assets and the potential challenges in regulating financial innovation in this area. He highlighted that early engagement is incredibly valuable for monitoring, supervisory, and policy purposes. Working with innovative firms helps to achieve a better bird’s-eye view, thus enhancing understanding when the overall landscape is blurry and changing quickly. He also discussed how FCA looks to critically analyze different cryptoassets and why labels such as "stablecoin" are not very helpful.
Mr Woolard explained that market participants use "stablecoin" as a broad term that encompasses a variety of different types of cryptoassets. An October 2018 joint report by BoE, FCA, and HM Treasury categorized crypto-assets into exchange tokens, security tokens, and utility tokens. A stablecoin could also refer to a crypto-asset backed by fiat currency. In certain cases, a fiat-collateralized crypto-asset could constitute e-money if it meets the definition provided in the Electronic Money Regulations. He said that this makes us question how useful the term stabledcoin is when it comes to labeling all these different tokens. He added that a stablecoin could fall within or between one of the several regulatory categories. If a cryptoasset is e-money, then the issuer needs to be authorized as an e-money issuer and needs to comply with all relevant requirements under the E-Money and Payment Services Regulations. The term stablecoin could equally apply to algorithmically controlled tokens or those backed by real world assets such as securities or, indeed, other cryptoassets.
He added that FCA seeks to consider any crypto-asset, including those labeled stablecoin, on a case-by-case basis and encourages both consumers and firms to do likewise. Stablecoins would need to be evaluated on their characteristics, but could amount to regulated products, including, for example, collective investment schemes. This analysis is particularly important when identifying whether a specific crypto-asset sits within the regulatory perimeter or outside of it. Depending on its structure it could be many things—for instance, a derivative, a unit in a collective investment scheme, another kind of security or e-money. He also discussed how innovators should navigate the landscape and what approach regulators should take. "Innovation won’t pause whilst regulators in different jurisdictions each scramble to get the best snapshot—that is why it is critical that regulators work in concert internationally on fast-moving, cross-border issues."
According to Mr. Woolard, big surprises in financial markets do not generally end in positive outcomes for consumers, regulators, or firms. Therefore, FCA invites firms to consider applying to its innovation firm support services, such as direct support, which provides regulatory feedback for eligible innovative propositions or the Regulatory Sandbox, which provides firms with the opportunity to setup compliant and controlled tests. FCA has worked with many innovative firms on crypto-assets to-date—over a third of propositions accepted to test in the Sandbox so far have involved an application of distributed ledger technology. Not only does this help bolster competition by helping innovative firms overcome regulatory barriers, to the benefit of markets and consumers, but also to learn more about fast-moving, developing technologies potentially disrupting financial services over time, added Mr. Woolard.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, Crypto-Assets, Distributed Ledger Technology, Stablecoin, Fintech, Regtech, Regulatory Sandbox, FCA
Previous ArticleUS Treasury Issues Statement on US-EU Financial Regulatory Forum
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).