While speaking at the Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance annual conference, Christopher Woolard of FCA examined the ongoing work in regulation of crypto-assets and the potential challenges in regulating financial innovation in this area. He highlighted that early engagement is incredibly valuable for monitoring, supervisory, and policy purposes. Working with innovative firms helps to achieve a better bird’s-eye view, thus enhancing understanding when the overall landscape is blurry and changing quickly. He also discussed how FCA looks to critically analyze different cryptoassets and why labels such as "stablecoin" are not very helpful.
Mr Woolard explained that market participants use "stablecoin" as a broad term that encompasses a variety of different types of cryptoassets. An October 2018 joint report by BoE, FCA, and HM Treasury categorized crypto-assets into exchange tokens, security tokens, and utility tokens. A stablecoin could also refer to a crypto-asset backed by fiat currency. In certain cases, a fiat-collateralized crypto-asset could constitute e-money if it meets the definition provided in the Electronic Money Regulations. He said that this makes us question how useful the term stabledcoin is when it comes to labeling all these different tokens. He added that a stablecoin could fall within or between one of the several regulatory categories. If a cryptoasset is e-money, then the issuer needs to be authorized as an e-money issuer and needs to comply with all relevant requirements under the E-Money and Payment Services Regulations. The term stablecoin could equally apply to algorithmically controlled tokens or those backed by real world assets such as securities or, indeed, other cryptoassets.
He added that FCA seeks to consider any crypto-asset, including those labeled stablecoin, on a case-by-case basis and encourages both consumers and firms to do likewise. Stablecoins would need to be evaluated on their characteristics, but could amount to regulated products, including, for example, collective investment schemes. This analysis is particularly important when identifying whether a specific crypto-asset sits within the regulatory perimeter or outside of it. Depending on its structure it could be many things—for instance, a derivative, a unit in a collective investment scheme, another kind of security or e-money. He also discussed how innovators should navigate the landscape and what approach regulators should take. "Innovation won’t pause whilst regulators in different jurisdictions each scramble to get the best snapshot—that is why it is critical that regulators work in concert internationally on fast-moving, cross-border issues."
According to Mr. Woolard, big surprises in financial markets do not generally end in positive outcomes for consumers, regulators, or firms. Therefore, FCA invites firms to consider applying to its innovation firm support services, such as direct support, which provides regulatory feedback for eligible innovative propositions or the Regulatory Sandbox, which provides firms with the opportunity to setup compliant and controlled tests. FCA has worked with many innovative firms on crypto-assets to-date—over a third of propositions accepted to test in the Sandbox so far have involved an application of distributed ledger technology. Not only does this help bolster competition by helping innovative firms overcome regulatory barriers, to the benefit of markets and consumers, but also to learn more about fast-moving, developing technologies potentially disrupting financial services over time, added Mr. Woolard.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, Crypto-Assets, Distributed Ledger Technology, Stablecoin, Fintech, Regtech, Regulatory Sandbox, FCA
Previous ArticleEBA Issues Advice on Implementation of Basel III Framework in EU
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.