IASB, during its January meeting, continued to consider its response to the concerns and implementation challenges raised in relation to IFRS 17, the new insurance contracts standard. IASB decided to propose targeted improvements in three areas that it expects will ease implementation of IFRS 17 and also make it easier for companies to explain the results of applying IFRS 17 to investors and others.
The changes IASB voted to propose are linked to the recognition of contract costs, reinsurance contracts, and the investment service elements of a contract. IASB will continue its discussions at future meetings and expects to publish a document for consultation on proposed narrow-scope amendments around the middle of the year. IASB concluded that, on balance, these amendments meet the criteria for potential changes that IASB agreed in October 2018.
IASB issued IFRS 17 in May 2017 and the standard will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 01, 2021. Insurance contracts combine features of both a financial instrument and a service contract. In addition, many insurance contracts generate cash flows with substantial variability over a long period. To provide useful information about these features, IFRS 17:
- combines current measurement of the future cash flows with the recognition of profit over the period that services are provided under the contract
- presents insurance service results (including presentation of insurance revenue) separately from insurance finance income or expenses
- requires an entity to make an accounting policy choice of whether to recognize all insurance finance income or expenses in profit or loss or to recognize some of that income or expenses in other comprehensive income
Keywords: International, Accounting, Insurance, IFRS 17, Insurance Contract, January Meeting, IASB
Previous ArticleIFRS Foundation Updates the IFRS Taxonomy Guide for Preparers
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.