ESMA published a call for evidence on potential product intervention measures related to the provision of contracts for differences (CFDs), including rolling spot forex and binary options to retail investors. The submission period for responses will close on February 05, 2018.
ESMA published a statement on December 15, 2017, explaining that it was considering the possible use of its product intervention powers under Article 40 of Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation to address investor protection concerns posed by the marketing, distribution, and sale of CFDs and binary options to retail investors. It is now seeking evidence from stakeholders on the impact of the proposed measures related to CFDs and binary options. ESMA is also considering whether CFDs in crypto currencies should be addressed in the measures. The potential measures under consideration are as follows:
- Leverage limits on the opening of a position by a retail client. These would range from 30:1 to 5:1 to reflect the historical price behavior of different classes of underlying assets.
- A margin close out rule on a position by position basis. This would standardize the percentage of margin at which providers are required to close out a retail client’s open CFD.
- Negative balance protection on a per account basis. This would provide an overall guaranteed limit on retail client losses
- A restriction on the incentivization of trading provided by a CFD provider.
- A standardized risk warning by CFD providers. This would include an indication of the range of losses on retail investor accounts.
- Prohibition on the marketing, distribution, or sale of binary options to retail investors.
Comment Due Date: February 05, 2018
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, MiFIR, CFDs, Binary Options, Investor Protection, ESMA
Previous ArticleECB Consults on Guides to Bank Licensing and Fintech Bank Licensing
EBA published phase 2 of the technical package on the reporting framework 2.10, providing the technical tools and specifications for implementation of EBA reporting requirements.
FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update that would grant insurance companies, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, an additional year to implement the Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12 on targeted improvements to accounting for long-duration insurance contracts, or LDTI (Topic 944).
EBA published a statement on resolution planning in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
ESMA updated the reporting manual on the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).
BCBS and FSB published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition.
APRA updated the regulatory approach for loans subject to repayment deferrals amid the COVID-19 crisis.
IAIS published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition from an insurance perspective.
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.