ESMA has started publishing the list of questions received through its question and answer (Q&A) process. The questions are grouped by topic or legislative act—namely, including Corporate Disclosure, Credit Rating Agencies, Fund Management, MiFID and Investor Protection, MiFID/MiFIR and Secondary Markets, Market Abuse Regulation, Benchmarks Regulation, Short Selling Regulation, Post Trading, Innovation and Products, Prospectus Regulation, and Securitization Regulation. In case updates are required, ESMA will update the Q&A weekly.
This publication comes in the context of the entry into force of the revised ESMA regulation, which includes the new provisions applicable to Q&A. The new provisions require ESMA to setup a web-based tool to facilitate the submission of questions and to publish questions received, along with answers to the admissible questions. Q&As constitute a form of guidance on the acts within the remit of ESMA. As is the case with other forms of guidance, Q&As are adopted by the ESMA Board of Supervisors. Q&As are not legally binding, yet their application will be rigorously scrutinized by ESMA and national competent authorities, given their practical significance to achieve a level playing field. In the areas where ESMA is the direct supervisor of financial market participants, Q&As act to inform its approach.
ESMA is committed to implementing this web-based tool and is working on developing the necessary IT infrastructure. The roll-out of the IT infrastructure will be done on a phased basis and during the year. Pending the full implementation of this web-based tool, stakeholders can continue submitting questions to ESMA through the Q&A webpage of the ESMA website. ESMA has started publishing, in advance, on its website the following questions:
- Questions for which a Q&A will be put on the agenda of the relevant Standing Committee of ESMA
- Rejected questions—that is, questions that were tabled for discussions in an ESMA Standing Committee and to which ESMA does not intend to provide an answer
- Questions forwarded to EC
Keywords: Europe, Banking, Securities, Q&A, Securitization Regulation, Benchmark Regulation, Credit Rating Agencies, Big Data, Fintech, ESMA
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.