MAS published response to a question asked in the Parliament on measures to target small and medium-size enterprise (SME) awareness and accessibility under the Green and Sustainability-Linked Loan Grant Scheme (GSLS). The response states that the GSLS has a track that encourages banks to develop green and sustainability-linked loan frameworks, which will have to include eligibility criteria that are verified against internationally recognized green and sustainability-linked loan principles. This removes the need for SMEs to develop their own customized frameworks before obtaining a green or sustainability-linked loan, and reduces the friction SMEs face in accessing such loans. HSBC and OCBC have launched such green and sustainability-linked loan frameworks for SMEs.
GSLS aims to support companies of all sizes, including SMEs. MAS will defray up to SGD 100,000 of the expenses incurred by borrowers in engaging independent service providers to verify the green and sustainability credentials of such loans. While the GSLS supports the adoption of such loans, MAS recognizes that the cost, time, and effort of procuring the necessary sustainability advisory and assessment services may not be commensurate with the loan quantum, particularly for smaller SMEs. The GSLS, therefore, has the track that encourages banks to develop green and sustainability-linked loan frameworks. Under this track, MAS provides greater funding support to banks when they develop loan frameworks that are targeted at SMEs. Expenses incurred by banks to develop, verify, and report on the green and sustainability credentials of loan frameworks targeted at SMEs will be defrayed by 90%, compared with 60% of expenses for other green and sustainability-linked loan frameworks. MAS expects to support more banks in developing such frameworks under the GSLS. To promote awareness and encourage take-up of the GSLS, MAS is partnering with Enterprise Singapore (ESG) and banks to reach out to SMEs.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, GSLS, Sustainable Finance, ESG, SME, Credit Risk, MAS
Previous ArticleBDF Publishes AnaCredit Reporting Specifications for OneGate Portal
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting