EC welcomed the political agreement reached by the European Parliament and member states on more proportionate and effective prudential rules for investment firms, under the EU Capital Markets Union. The revised legislation will ensure more proportionate rules and better supervision for all investment firms on capital, liquidity, and other risk management requirements.
The revised legislation should also ensure a level-playing field between large and systemic financial institutions: investment firms that conduct bank-like activities and pose similar risks as banks will be subject to the same rules and supervision as banks. Moreover, simpler and less risky firms will benefit from a fully revised rulebook more tailored to their business models. As part of the new framework, equivalence rules for the provision of investment services by third-country firms will also be strengthened and clarified. Further technical work will follow this political agreement so that the European Parliament and the Council can formally adopt the final texts under this legislature.
EC had, in December 2017, adopted a proposal for a regulation and a proposal for a directive to amend the current EU prudential rules for investment firms. The aim of the review is to introduce more proportionate and risk-sensitive rules for investment firms. The two proposed acts under this would amend the existing prudential framework for investment firms, as set out in the capital requirements directive and regulation (CRD IV/CRR) and in the markets in financial instruments directive and regulation (MiFID2/MiFIR). The December 2017 EC proposal on prudential rules for investment firms is part of the EC Action Plan to strengthen the Capital Markets Union. The rules support the goal of the Capital Markets Union to further promote the activities of firms helping investments flow from Europe's savers to Europe's businesses, with due regard for their risks.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, CRD IV, CRR, Proportionality, Investment Firms, Capital Markets Union, EC
Previous ArticleESMA Chair on Response to Developments on Crypto-Assets
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting