RBI issued a statement that sets out various developmental and regulatory policy measures for improving credit flows to certain sectors, strengthening regulation and supervision, broadening and deepening financial markets, and improving payment and settlement systems. These measures include those related to the liquidity management framework and the margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.
Well-established margining arrangements for financial contracts contribute to financial stability by enhancing credibility of the market mechanism and discouraging excessive risk-taking. To improve safety of settlement of the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives that are not centrally cleared, following the G-20 recommendations, RBI had issued a discussion paper to implement global practices related to margin requirements for such derivatives. The introduction of legislation for netting of financial transactions proposed in the Union Budget 2020-21 would be a significant enabler for efficient margining. It has, therefore, been decided to issue the directions regarding the exchange of variation margin for non-centrally cleared derivatives by the end of March 2020. Draft directions on exchange of initial margin for non-centrally cleared derivatives will be issued by the end of June 2020.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, India, Banking, Securities, Margin Requirements, Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives, OTC Derivatives, Initial Margin, Variation Margin, RBI
Previous ArticleBDE Updates Instructions for Reporting by Banks in February 2020
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.