EIOPA published the discussion paper on interbank offered rate (IBOR) transitions. This discussion paper addresses, for the first time, the subject of the ongoing changes to the new benchmark rates, along with the issues identified in the EIOPA risk-free rate environment. The comment period for this paper is open until April 30, 2020. Based on the feedback received to this discussion paper, EIOPA will launch a consultation, which will include specific policy recommendations on the subject of IBOR transitions.
The focus of this discussion paper is to address the issues identified with the EIOPA risk-free rate methodology and the EIOPA risk-free rate production and to propose solutions and options for consideration. The paper highlights the potential impact of IBOR transitions on the definition and the use of the Credit Rate Adjustment currently applied on the risk-free rate term structures. Furthermore, the paper proposes options and a coherent approach for dealing with the new term structures calculated with the new benchmark rates for all currencies. The proposed approaches are generic and can be applied to all currencies.
The IBOR transition is a big challenge for both the regulators and the industry. New rates have differences between each other and the timing of the change for each jurisdiction may vary, thus posing additional challenges. Overall, the impact of the IBOR transitions in all currencies will be directly reflected on liability valuations, asset-liability management calculations and derivative valuations, and the structure of numerous (existing and new) financial and insurance products, which will refer to the new rates. Re-calibration of existing products and revaluations is expected to take place.
The risk-free rate methodology of EIOPA seeks to reflect the current market conditions rather than leading them to continue producing consistent risk-free rate term structures. According to the risk-free rate methodology, the approach of EIOPA is designed to secure the objectives of replicability of the methodology by undertakings, market consistency of the risk-free rate term structures produced, stability for insurance undertakings, and interests of policyholders. All four criteria, along with the criterion of the feasibility of the implementation within the risk-free rate framework have been considered thoroughly. Additional issues related to the IBOR transitions, which emerge outside the risk-free rate environment and may, directly or indirectly, affect the insurance industry and the policyholders are not covered in this paper.
Comment Due Date: April 30, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Benchmarks Regulation, Risk-Free Rates, ALM, IBOR Transition, Benchmark Reforms, EIOPA
Previous ArticleEIOPA Finalizes Guidelines on Outsourcing to Cloud Service Providers
Next ArticleESMA Publishes Its Strategy on Sustainable Finance
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) announced that the guidelines on the reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures COVID-relief measures shall continue to apply until further notice.
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FI) announced that the capital adequacy reporting as at December 31, 2021 must be done by February 11, 2022.
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0.