EIOPA published the discussion paper on interbank offered rate (IBOR) transitions. This discussion paper addresses, for the first time, the subject of the ongoing changes to the new benchmark rates, along with the issues identified in the EIOPA risk-free rate environment. The comment period for this paper is open until April 30, 2020. Based on the feedback received to this discussion paper, EIOPA will launch a consultation, which will include specific policy recommendations on the subject of IBOR transitions.
The focus of this discussion paper is to address the issues identified with the EIOPA risk-free rate methodology and the EIOPA risk-free rate production and to propose solutions and options for consideration. The paper highlights the potential impact of IBOR transitions on the definition and the use of the Credit Rate Adjustment currently applied on the risk-free rate term structures. Furthermore, the paper proposes options and a coherent approach for dealing with the new term structures calculated with the new benchmark rates for all currencies. The proposed approaches are generic and can be applied to all currencies.
The IBOR transition is a big challenge for both the regulators and the industry. New rates have differences between each other and the timing of the change for each jurisdiction may vary, thus posing additional challenges. Overall, the impact of the IBOR transitions in all currencies will be directly reflected on liability valuations, asset-liability management calculations and derivative valuations, and the structure of numerous (existing and new) financial and insurance products, which will refer to the new rates. Re-calibration of existing products and revaluations is expected to take place.
The risk-free rate methodology of EIOPA seeks to reflect the current market conditions rather than leading them to continue producing consistent risk-free rate term structures. According to the risk-free rate methodology, the approach of EIOPA is designed to secure the objectives of replicability of the methodology by undertakings, market consistency of the risk-free rate term structures produced, stability for insurance undertakings, and interests of policyholders. All four criteria, along with the criterion of the feasibility of the implementation within the risk-free rate framework have been considered thoroughly. Additional issues related to the IBOR transitions, which emerge outside the risk-free rate environment and may, directly or indirectly, affect the insurance industry and the policyholders are not covered in this paper.
Comment Due Date: April 30, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Benchmarks Regulation, Risk-Free Rates, ALM, IBOR Transition, Benchmark Reforms, EIOPA
Previous ArticleEIOPA Finalizes Guidelines on Outsourcing to Cloud Service Providers
Next ArticleESMA Publishes Its Strategy on Sustainable Finance
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.