FCA published the findings from a review that looked at how financial firms manage technology change, the impact of change failures, and the practices utilized in the industry to help reduce the impact of incidents resulting from change management. While there is no single approach, process, or control that improves change success rates, the analysis found that stronger governance, day-to-day risk management, increased automation, and more robust testing and planning can contribute to successful change activity and less disruption.
Based on the review, FCA found that firms with higher change success rates had the following common characteristics:
- Firms with well-established governance arrangements have a higher change success rate. There was a positive correlation between the longevity of governance arrangements and higher change success rates in the sampled firms. The data showed that robust governance can help reduce the number and impact of operational incidents resulting from change.
- Relying on high levels of legacy technology is linked to more failed and emergency changes. FCA found that firms with a lower proportion of legacy infrastructure and applications had a higher change success rate. Firms with a lower proportion of legacy technology also had a lower proportion of changes being deployed as emergencies and had a higher chance of those emergency changes being successfully deployed.
- Firms that allocated a higher proportion of their technology budget to change activities experienced fewer change related incidents. Firms that had the lowest proportion of changes resulting in an incident dedicated between 50% and 75% of their information technology budget to these change activities.
- Frequent releases and agile delivery can help firms to reduce the likelihood and impact of change related incidents. FCA found that firms that deployed smaller, more frequent releases had higher change success rates than those with longer release cycles. Firms that made effective use of agile delivery methodologies were also less likely to experience a change incident.
- Effective risk management is an important component of effective change management capabilities. Firms that experienced less incidents due to failed changes mitigated the risk of technology change by leveraging a wide range of technical and business knowledge to ensure that potential impacts were well understood.
In addition, FCA identified the following areas that could lead to increased operational disruption when carrying out change activity:
- Most firms do not have complete visibility of third-party changes. According to firms’ incident reporting, in 2019, over 20% of incidents at third-parties were caused by change. Workshop attendees suggested that third-party contracts could be better utilized to provide greater clarity on how changes are communicated and on the potential impact to the information technology estate of a client firm.
- Firms’ change management processes are heavily reliant on manual review and actions. Repeatability and consistency throughout the lifecycle of a change and its deployment could help reduce the burden of assurance activity and could also allow for a higher degree of confidence when implementing technology change.
- Legacy technology impacts firms’ ability to implement new technologies and innovative approaches. Firms that classified a higher proportion of their technology estate as legacy had lower adoption rates for DevOps, micro-architecture, and public cloud, which could affect the ability of these to benefit from innovative approaches.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, Technology Risk, Governance, Fintech, Change Management, Operational Risk, Third-Party Arrangements, Cloud Computing, Outsourcing Arrangements, FCA
Previous ArticleHM Treasury Allows Extended Repayment Delay Under COVID Loan Scheme
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.