IOSCO published a report outlining recommendations with respect to a framework for monitoring leverage in investment funds that may pose financial stability risks. The report presents a two-step framework: Step 1 indicates how regulators could exclude from consideration funds that are unlikely to produce financial stability risks while identifying a subset of funds for further analysis that may pose such risks; Step 2 entails a risk-based analysis of the subset of funds identified in Step 1. IOSCO shall, based on the data available to it, publish an annual report reflecting leverage trends in the global asset management industry. The first report is scheduled to be published in 2021, though IOSCO intends to gradually expand subsequent reports to include more jurisdictions.
For the first step, IOSCO recommends that regulators use Gross Notional Exposure or adjusted Gross Notional Exposure as baseline analytical tools. By collecting information on long and short exposures, on an asset class basis, the regulatory community will gain greater insight on the direction of leverage. For the second step, IOSCO recommends that each regulator determine its approach to define appropriate risk-based measures for analyzing funds identified under the first step that may potentially pose significant leverage related risks to the financial system. The recommendations aim to achieve a balance between precise leverage measures and simple, robust metrics that regulators can apply consistently to the wide range of funds offered in different jurisdictions.
The two-step leverage framework provides a holistic approach to capture significant leverage-related risks of a fund (or group of funds) to give regulators the tools to assess these risks for financial stability purposes. The framework embeds proportionality, by acknowledging that not all funds need to be captured for financial stability monitoring purposes, given the immense diversity in funds’ structures, types, and strategies as well as domestic legal and regulatory frameworks governing these investment vehicles. Some funds, for example, are prohibited from using leverage. More generally, under this leverage framework, funds that do not pose systemic risks due to their leverage would be excluded, such as funds capped in terms of leverage and/or limited in size.
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Leveraged Lending, Financial Stability, Investment Funds, IOSCO
APRA updated the lists of the Direct to APRA (D2A) validation and derivation rules for authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation entities.
EC adopted a package that includes the digital finance and retail payments strategies and the legislative proposals for regulatory frameworks on crypto-assets and digital operational resilience.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/22) on proposals for regulations amending the securitization framework of EU, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
FCA is consulting on its approach to the authorization and supervision of international firms operating in UK.
MAS published amendments to Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements for reporting banks incorporated in Singapore.
FCA announced that it will move firms to RegData from Gabriel in the coming months in stages, based on the reporting requirements of firms.
ISDA issued a letter to regulators to flag that it now expects the supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions and the Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) Fallbacks Protocol to be effective around mid- to late-January 2021.
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.