CNB published the results of supervisory stress tests conducted on banks and insurance companies, using data as of the end of 2018. The results of the stress tests demonstrated that the two sectors are still prepared to withstand a deterioration in economic conditions. The supervisory stress tests will be conducted at two-year frequency, with CNB planning to conduct the next supervisory stress tests in 2021. However, CNB may revert to the annual stress test in the event of significant changes in the financial or macroeconomic situation or other material facts.
For the supervisory stress tests of banks, CNB, for the second time, applied the EBA methodology, adjusted to the conditions of the Czech banking sector. The tests were extended from the largest banking groups, which were tested last year, to almost all banks subject to CNB supervision. Thus, the tested banks account for nearly 91% of the assets of the Czech banking sector (as compared to 76% last year). The tests covered credit, market, and operational risks; interest and non-interest income and expenses; and capital. The aggregate results of the supervisory stress tests of banks subject to CNB supervision confirmed that the banks are resilient to hypothetical adverse economic developments. The capital ratio of the part of the banking sector tested would drop to 14.8% under a stress scenario assuming a sizable decline in economic activity in the Czech Republic and abroad. However, it would remain well above the regulatory minimum of 8%. The resilience of banking groups is based mainly on their initial capital ratio, which amounted to 18.4% at the end of 2018. As usual, credit risk had the most significant impact of the risks under review.
Additionally, 18 domestic insurance companies, which account for 98% of the domestic insurance market in 2018 based on gross premiums written, participated in the 2019 supervisory stress tests for insurance companies. The stress test assessed the impact of shocks for individual risks on each insurance company’s solvency ratio (that is, the ratio of eligible own funds to the solvency capital requirement). The focus was on testing the impact of investment risks, the risk of claims due to natural disasters, the risk of a decrease in non-life insurance premiums, and the risk of an immediate lapse of 10% of the life insurance portfolio of an insurance company. The aggregate results of the stress test demonstrated that the insurance sector had sufficient own funds to absorb relatively significant changes in risk factors at the end of 2018. The overall solvency ratio of the tested insurance companies was 157%, even after the application of shocks for market and insurance risks and was, thus, relatively high above the regulatory minimum of 100%. Out of the risks under review, equity risk and the risk of a drop in government bond prices had the largest impact.
- Press Release
- Stress Test Results for Banks (PDF)
- Stress Test Results for Insurers (PDF)
- Underlying Data for Banks (XLSX in Czech)
- Underlying Data for Insurers (XLSX in Czech)
Keywords: Europe, Czech Republic, Banking, Insurance, Stress Testing, Solvency Ratio, Credit Risk, CNB
Previous ArticleAPRA Issues Proposal to Amend Leverage Ratio Requirement for Banks
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.