CNB published the results of supervisory stress tests conducted on banks and insurance companies, using data as of the end of 2018. The results of the stress tests demonstrated that the two sectors are still prepared to withstand a deterioration in economic conditions. The supervisory stress tests will be conducted at two-year frequency, with CNB planning to conduct the next supervisory stress tests in 2021. However, CNB may revert to the annual stress test in the event of significant changes in the financial or macroeconomic situation or other material facts.
For the supervisory stress tests of banks, CNB, for the second time, applied the EBA methodology, adjusted to the conditions of the Czech banking sector. The tests were extended from the largest banking groups, which were tested last year, to almost all banks subject to CNB supervision. Thus, the tested banks account for nearly 91% of the assets of the Czech banking sector (as compared to 76% last year). The tests covered credit, market, and operational risks; interest and non-interest income and expenses; and capital. The aggregate results of the supervisory stress tests of banks subject to CNB supervision confirmed that the banks are resilient to hypothetical adverse economic developments. The capital ratio of the part of the banking sector tested would drop to 14.8% under a stress scenario assuming a sizable decline in economic activity in the Czech Republic and abroad. However, it would remain well above the regulatory minimum of 8%. The resilience of banking groups is based mainly on their initial capital ratio, which amounted to 18.4% at the end of 2018. As usual, credit risk had the most significant impact of the risks under review.
Additionally, 18 domestic insurance companies, which account for 98% of the domestic insurance market in 2018 based on gross premiums written, participated in the 2019 supervisory stress tests for insurance companies. The stress test assessed the impact of shocks for individual risks on each insurance company’s solvency ratio (that is, the ratio of eligible own funds to the solvency capital requirement). The focus was on testing the impact of investment risks, the risk of claims due to natural disasters, the risk of a decrease in non-life insurance premiums, and the risk of an immediate lapse of 10% of the life insurance portfolio of an insurance company. The aggregate results of the stress test demonstrated that the insurance sector had sufficient own funds to absorb relatively significant changes in risk factors at the end of 2018. The overall solvency ratio of the tested insurance companies was 157%, even after the application of shocks for market and insurance risks and was, thus, relatively high above the regulatory minimum of 100%. Out of the risks under review, equity risk and the risk of a drop in government bond prices had the largest impact.
- Press Release
- Stress Test Results for Banks (PDF)
- Stress Test Results for Insurers (PDF)
- Underlying Data for Banks (XLSX in Czech)
- Underlying Data for Insurers (XLSX in Czech)
Keywords: Europe, Czech Republic, Banking, Insurance, Stress Testing, Solvency Ratio, Credit Risk, CNB
Previous ArticleAPRA Issues Proposal to Amend Leverage Ratio Requirement for Banks
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.