CNB published the results of supervisory stress tests conducted on banks and insurance companies, using data as of the end of 2018. The results of the stress tests demonstrated that the two sectors are still prepared to withstand a deterioration in economic conditions. The supervisory stress tests will be conducted at two-year frequency, with CNB planning to conduct the next supervisory stress tests in 2021. However, CNB may revert to the annual stress test in the event of significant changes in the financial or macroeconomic situation or other material facts.
For the supervisory stress tests of banks, CNB, for the second time, applied the EBA methodology, adjusted to the conditions of the Czech banking sector. The tests were extended from the largest banking groups, which were tested last year, to almost all banks subject to CNB supervision. Thus, the tested banks account for nearly 91% of the assets of the Czech banking sector (as compared to 76% last year). The tests covered credit, market, and operational risks; interest and non-interest income and expenses; and capital. The aggregate results of the supervisory stress tests of banks subject to CNB supervision confirmed that the banks are resilient to hypothetical adverse economic developments. The capital ratio of the part of the banking sector tested would drop to 14.8% under a stress scenario assuming a sizable decline in economic activity in the Czech Republic and abroad. However, it would remain well above the regulatory minimum of 8%. The resilience of banking groups is based mainly on their initial capital ratio, which amounted to 18.4% at the end of 2018. As usual, credit risk had the most significant impact of the risks under review.
Additionally, 18 domestic insurance companies, which account for 98% of the domestic insurance market in 2018 based on gross premiums written, participated in the 2019 supervisory stress tests for insurance companies. The stress test assessed the impact of shocks for individual risks on each insurance company’s solvency ratio (that is, the ratio of eligible own funds to the solvency capital requirement). The focus was on testing the impact of investment risks, the risk of claims due to natural disasters, the risk of a decrease in non-life insurance premiums, and the risk of an immediate lapse of 10% of the life insurance portfolio of an insurance company. The aggregate results of the stress test demonstrated that the insurance sector had sufficient own funds to absorb relatively significant changes in risk factors at the end of 2018. The overall solvency ratio of the tested insurance companies was 157%, even after the application of shocks for market and insurance risks and was, thus, relatively high above the regulatory minimum of 100%. Out of the risks under review, equity risk and the risk of a drop in government bond prices had the largest impact.
- Press Release
- Stress Test Results for Banks (PDF)
- Stress Test Results for Insurers (PDF)
- Underlying Data for Banks (XLSX in Czech)
- Underlying Data for Insurers (XLSX in Czech)
Keywords: Europe, Czech Republic, Banking, Insurance, Stress Testing, Solvency Ratio, Credit Risk, CNB
Previous ArticleIAIS Publishes Report on 2019 G-SII Identification Process
BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.
In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.