CNB published the results of supervisory stress tests conducted on banks and insurance companies, using data as of the end of 2018. The results of the stress tests demonstrated that the two sectors are still prepared to withstand a deterioration in economic conditions. The supervisory stress tests will be conducted at two-year frequency, with CNB planning to conduct the next supervisory stress tests in 2021. However, CNB may revert to the annual stress test in the event of significant changes in the financial or macroeconomic situation or other material facts.
For the supervisory stress tests of banks, CNB, for the second time, applied the EBA methodology, adjusted to the conditions of the Czech banking sector. The tests were extended from the largest banking groups, which were tested last year, to almost all banks subject to CNB supervision. Thus, the tested banks account for nearly 91% of the assets of the Czech banking sector (as compared to 76% last year). The tests covered credit, market, and operational risks; interest and non-interest income and expenses; and capital. The aggregate results of the supervisory stress tests of banks subject to CNB supervision confirmed that the banks are resilient to hypothetical adverse economic developments. The capital ratio of the part of the banking sector tested would drop to 14.8% under a stress scenario assuming a sizable decline in economic activity in the Czech Republic and abroad. However, it would remain well above the regulatory minimum of 8%. The resilience of banking groups is based mainly on their initial capital ratio, which amounted to 18.4% at the end of 2018. As usual, credit risk had the most significant impact of the risks under review.
Additionally, 18 domestic insurance companies, which account for 98% of the domestic insurance market in 2018 based on gross premiums written, participated in the 2019 supervisory stress tests for insurance companies. The stress test assessed the impact of shocks for individual risks on each insurance company’s solvency ratio (that is, the ratio of eligible own funds to the solvency capital requirement). The focus was on testing the impact of investment risks, the risk of claims due to natural disasters, the risk of a decrease in non-life insurance premiums, and the risk of an immediate lapse of 10% of the life insurance portfolio of an insurance company. The aggregate results of the stress test demonstrated that the insurance sector had sufficient own funds to absorb relatively significant changes in risk factors at the end of 2018. The overall solvency ratio of the tested insurance companies was 157%, even after the application of shocks for market and insurance risks and was, thus, relatively high above the regulatory minimum of 100%. Out of the risks under review, equity risk and the risk of a drop in government bond prices had the largest impact.
- Press Release
- Stress Test Results for Banks (PDF)
- Stress Test Results for Insurers (PDF)
- Underlying Data for Banks (XLSX in Czech)
- Underlying Data for Insurers (XLSX in Czech)
Keywords: Europe, Czech Republic, Banking, Insurance, Stress Testing, Solvency Ratio, Credit Risk, CNB
Previous ArticleIAIS Publishes Report on 2019 G-SII Identification Process
IAIS published technical specifications, questionnaires, and templates for 2020 Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) and Aggregation Method data collections.
BIS announced that it will establish new Innovation Hub centers across Europe and in North America in cooperation with member central banks.
FED updated the reporting form for FR 2052a, which is used to monitor the overall liquidity profile of certain supervised institutions.
PRA published a statement that sets out its views on certain amendments made to Capital Requirements Regulations (CRR and CRR2) via EU Regulation 2020/873 (CRR "Quick Fix"), including some guidance for firms.
The Climate Financial Risk Forum (CFRF), which is a joint climate risk forum of FCA and PRA, published a guide written by the industry for the industry to help firms approach and address climate-related financial risks.
IAIS published an application paper on liquidity risk management for insurers.
EBA published its response to the EC consultation on a new Digital Finance Strategy for Europe.
EIOPA responded to the EC consultation on a new digital finance strategy for Europe.
ESMA published its response to the EC consultation on the new digital finance strategy for EU.
FSB published, for consultation, a report on evaluation of the too-big-to-fail (TBTF) reforms for systemically important banks.