Featured Product

    SRB Issues Guidance to Ensure Resolvability of Banks Engaging in M&As

    December 07, 2020

    SRB published guidance outlining the expectations for how banks engaging in mergers and acquisitions (M&As) can ensure resolvability. The expectations provide more detail to banks on the information SRB may need as such cases progress. The guidance also offers insights into the potential effects on resolvability in areas such as maintaining sufficient loss-absorption and recapitalization capacity, integrating information systems, strengthening operational continuity and access to the financial market infrastructure (FMI) services, and rationalizing the new legal structure. SRB expects banks to share information on prospective corporate transactions that are likely to result in a material change as soon as possible.

    As laid out in the SRB Expectations for Banks policy (which was published in April 2020), any bank engaging in M&As or other corporate transactions should contact SRB to detail their intentions. In case of a relevant M&A transaction, SRB expects banks to prepare a revised resolvability work plan respecting the overall requirements. The paper aims to raise the awareness of banks conducting M&As and other corporate transactions with regard to the potential consequences on their resolvability. Banks are expected to:

    • With respect to loss-absorption and recapitalization capacity, maintain a sufficient level of capacity at the point of entry and subsidiary levels, to absorb losses in resolution, comply with the conditions for authorization, and regain market confidence post-resolution; also, review and update the mechanisms supporting the operationalization of write-down and conversion in the light of the transaction
    • With respect to integrating information systems to meet data requirements, maintain, throughout the implementation process, appropriate governance arrangements and responsibilities related to data collection and aggregation, across different areas of the bank and group entities; ensure that quality assurance capabilities remain effective and that documentation supporting data collection, aggregation and validation is updated; ensure that the information necessary for resolution planning and decisions, including Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) reporting, can be delivered timely, with a sufficient level of quality; assess their capabilities to produce SRB Dataset for Valuation and the information necessary to apply the resolution tools and to develop implementation plans in consultation with Internal resolution teams (IRTs).
    • With respect to strengthening operational continuity in resolution, following the completion of the transaction, revisit the assessment of risks to operational continuity and the identification and mapping of critical and essential services (including FMI services), operational assets, and key staff to the legal entities providing or receiving the services; prepare a plan to mitigate such risks by establishing insolvency-remote service companies, putting in place or amending service level agreements, (re-)negotiating resolution-resilient clauses in service contracts, and transferring licenses or purchasing intellectual property rights; revisit the FMI contingency strategy and plan.
    • For rationalizing the legal structure after the operation, consider, when defining the envisaged post-transaction group structure and preparing the integration plan, potential measures to facilitate the separation of core business lines and critical functions in resolution and consider, if needed, in consultation with SRB, whether certain measures could contribute to the effective application of a Single Point of Entry (SPE) or a Multiple Point of Entry (MPE) resolution approach; also assess whether additional economic functions could become critical and ensure that their operational and financial continuity can be ensured in resolution and where applicable, when the transaction is completed, revisit business reorganization plan options post bail-in and the measures to restore long-term viability

    SRB will take into account the principle of proportionality and follow a coordinated approach with supervisory authorities to avoid duplication of efforts. After the conclusion of the transaction, banks are expected to return to normal resolution planning activities, including the submission of up-to-date data in SRB resolution reports and revised documents supporting the operationalization of preferred resolution strategy.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Resolvability, Mergers and Acquisitions, Proportionality, FMI, MREL, Resolution Framework, SRB

    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Issues Interim Update to Policy Priorities for 2021 and Beyond

    In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.

    September 24, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Adopts Solvency II and Resolution Rules Package for Insurers

    The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.

    September 22, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OCC Issues Booklets on Regulatory Reporting and Earnings

    The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.

    September 22, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Sets Out Results of Economy-Wide Climate Stress Tests

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.

    September 22, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Examines Implications of Increasing Use of Digital Platforms in EU

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.

    September 21, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Issues Updates on Policy Measures Intended to Ease COVID Impact

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.

    September 21, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISDA Responds to BCBS Proposal on Treatment of Cryptoasset Exposures

    The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.

    September 21, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Quarterly Review Discusses Developments in Fintech and ESG Space

    BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.

    September 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS to Consult on Supervisory Practices for Climate Risks by Year-End

    The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards

    September 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OCC Identifies Operational Risk Deficiencies in MUFG Union Bank

    The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.

    September 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7494