SRB published guidance outlining the expectations for how banks engaging in mergers and acquisitions (M&As) can ensure resolvability. The expectations provide more detail to banks on the information SRB may need as such cases progress. The guidance also offers insights into the potential effects on resolvability in areas such as maintaining sufficient loss-absorption and recapitalization capacity, integrating information systems, strengthening operational continuity and access to the financial market infrastructure (FMI) services, and rationalizing the new legal structure. SRB expects banks to share information on prospective corporate transactions that are likely to result in a material change as soon as possible.
As laid out in the SRB Expectations for Banks policy (which was published in April 2020), any bank engaging in M&As or other corporate transactions should contact SRB to detail their intentions. In case of a relevant M&A transaction, SRB expects banks to prepare a revised resolvability work plan respecting the overall requirements. The paper aims to raise the awareness of banks conducting M&As and other corporate transactions with regard to the potential consequences on their resolvability. Banks are expected to:
- With respect to loss-absorption and recapitalization capacity, maintain a sufficient level of capacity at the point of entry and subsidiary levels, to absorb losses in resolution, comply with the conditions for authorization, and regain market confidence post-resolution; also, review and update the mechanisms supporting the operationalization of write-down and conversion in the light of the transaction
- With respect to integrating information systems to meet data requirements, maintain, throughout the implementation process, appropriate governance arrangements and responsibilities related to data collection and aggregation, across different areas of the bank and group entities; ensure that quality assurance capabilities remain effective and that documentation supporting data collection, aggregation and validation is updated; ensure that the information necessary for resolution planning and decisions, including Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) reporting, can be delivered timely, with a sufficient level of quality; assess their capabilities to produce SRB Dataset for Valuation and the information necessary to apply the resolution tools and to develop implementation plans in consultation with Internal resolution teams (IRTs).
- With respect to strengthening operational continuity in resolution, following the completion of the transaction, revisit the assessment of risks to operational continuity and the identification and mapping of critical and essential services (including FMI services), operational assets, and key staff to the legal entities providing or receiving the services; prepare a plan to mitigate such risks by establishing insolvency-remote service companies, putting in place or amending service level agreements, (re-)negotiating resolution-resilient clauses in service contracts, and transferring licenses or purchasing intellectual property rights; revisit the FMI contingency strategy and plan.
- For rationalizing the legal structure after the operation, consider, when defining the envisaged post-transaction group structure and preparing the integration plan, potential measures to facilitate the separation of core business lines and critical functions in resolution and consider, if needed, in consultation with SRB, whether certain measures could contribute to the effective application of a Single Point of Entry (SPE) or a Multiple Point of Entry (MPE) resolution approach; also assess whether additional economic functions could become critical and ensure that their operational and financial continuity can be ensured in resolution and where applicable, when the transaction is completed, revisit business reorganization plan options post bail-in and the measures to restore long-term viability
SRB will take into account the principle of proportionality and follow a coordinated approach with supervisory authorities to avoid duplication of efforts. After the conclusion of the transaction, banks are expected to return to normal resolution planning activities, including the submission of up-to-date data in SRB resolution reports and revised documents supporting the operationalization of preferred resolution strategy.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Resolvability, Mergers and Acquisitions, Proportionality, FMI, MREL, Resolution Framework, SRB
Previous ArticlePRA Finalizes Policy on Simplified Obligations for Recovery Planning
BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.
In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.