ECB published a response to the EC consultation on the new digital finance strategy for EU. ECB broadly supports the priority areas identified by EC in the consultation document to foster the development of digital finance in EU. These priorities have increased in importance in the light of the recent COVID-19 crisis and involve ensuring financial services regulatory framework is fit for the digital age; enabling consumers and firms to reap the opportunities offered by the EU-wide Single Market for digital financial services; promoting a well-regulated data-driven financial sector; and enhancing the digital operational resilience framework for financial services.
Regarding the priority that relates to enhancing the digital operational resilience framework, ECB has provided a separate contribution in the context of the specific consultation launched by EC on this matter. With respect to the other priorities of EC, ECB considers the following:
- With regard to ensuring the fitment of regulatory framework, important areas for improvement would be to enhance clarity on the application of existing laws and regulations to innovative technologies and related business models and to diminish the fragmentation resulting from different legal and regulatory frameworks and industry standards across EU member states, with the aim to foster the Internal Market, the pan-European application of standards, and a level playing field. In this regard, targeted amendments to legislation, interpretative guidance, and a periodic review of existing rules would be useful to ensure that the EU framework remains effective and technology neutral. While ECB sees some benefits in bespoke regimes for nascent technologies, such as distributed ledger technology, these will have to be balanced against the risks of their leading to a complex and potentially inconsistent regulatory framework.
- With regard to facilitating the use of digital financial identities throughout EU, ECB fully endorses the mandatory use of unique identifiers, based on internationally recognized global standards, including legal entity identifiers (LEIs), unique transaction identifiers (UTIs), and unique product identifiers (UPIs).
- ECB supports the need for enhanced cooperation throughout EU on different schemes, such as regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs, and acknowledges the benefits of fostering an open dialog between supervisors and supervised entities. This may encourage banks (and other financial entities) to launch innovative solutions, while being able to monitor the accompanying risks in a controlled environment.
- ECB considers that open finance can have implications for the supervised banks, at both entity and systemic levels, and also for the nature of the cooperation between these banks and new potential actors, such as third-party providers. In this respect, ECB is adapting its supervisory approach toward the regulated entities to the new landscape that the revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2) has enabled. While open finance and the use of alternative data (such as data from public sources) can enable the modernization of banks’ internal processes, it should be ensured that customer data sharing, also with third-party providers, meets clear legal requirements and fulfills security standards.
Related Link: ECB Response (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Digital Finance Strategy, Fintech Action Plan, Regtech, Regulatory Sandbox, Bigtech, Cloud Service Provides, Distributed Ledger Technology, Artificial Intelligence, ECB
Previous ArticleSARB Issues Directive to Amend Capital Framework Under Basel III
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.