ECB published a response to the EC consultation on the new digital finance strategy for EU. ECB broadly supports the priority areas identified by EC in the consultation document to foster the development of digital finance in EU. These priorities have increased in importance in the light of the recent COVID-19 crisis and involve ensuring financial services regulatory framework is fit for the digital age; enabling consumers and firms to reap the opportunities offered by the EU-wide Single Market for digital financial services; promoting a well-regulated data-driven financial sector; and enhancing the digital operational resilience framework for financial services.
Regarding the priority that relates to enhancing the digital operational resilience framework, ECB has provided a separate contribution in the context of the specific consultation launched by EC on this matter. With respect to the other priorities of EC, ECB considers the following:
- With regard to ensuring the fitment of regulatory framework, important areas for improvement would be to enhance clarity on the application of existing laws and regulations to innovative technologies and related business models and to diminish the fragmentation resulting from different legal and regulatory frameworks and industry standards across EU member states, with the aim to foster the Internal Market, the pan-European application of standards, and a level playing field. In this regard, targeted amendments to legislation, interpretative guidance, and a periodic review of existing rules would be useful to ensure that the EU framework remains effective and technology neutral. While ECB sees some benefits in bespoke regimes for nascent technologies, such as distributed ledger technology, these will have to be balanced against the risks of their leading to a complex and potentially inconsistent regulatory framework.
- With regard to facilitating the use of digital financial identities throughout EU, ECB fully endorses the mandatory use of unique identifiers, based on internationally recognized global standards, including legal entity identifiers (LEIs), unique transaction identifiers (UTIs), and unique product identifiers (UPIs).
- ECB supports the need for enhanced cooperation throughout EU on different schemes, such as regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs, and acknowledges the benefits of fostering an open dialog between supervisors and supervised entities. This may encourage banks (and other financial entities) to launch innovative solutions, while being able to monitor the accompanying risks in a controlled environment.
- ECB considers that open finance can have implications for the supervised banks, at both entity and systemic levels, and also for the nature of the cooperation between these banks and new potential actors, such as third-party providers. In this respect, ECB is adapting its supervisory approach toward the regulated entities to the new landscape that the revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2) has enabled. While open finance and the use of alternative data (such as data from public sources) can enable the modernization of banks’ internal processes, it should be ensured that customer data sharing, also with third-party providers, meets clear legal requirements and fulfills security standards.
Related Link: ECB Response (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Digital Finance Strategy, Fintech Action Plan, Regtech, Regulatory Sandbox, Bigtech, Cloud Service Provides, Distributed Ledger Technology, Artificial Intelligence, ECB
Previous ArticleSARB Issues Directive to Amend Capital Framework Under Basel III
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.