August 13, 2018

IA of Hong Kong issued templates and technical specifications for the second quantitative impact study (QIS 2) on the development of risk-based capital (RBC) regime. Additionally, IA released a package of template and technical specifications on matching adjustment for insurers conducting long-term business. Authorized insurers have been requested to participate in the QIS 2 and submit the completed template(s) by November 30, 2018.

IA released two different packages for QIS 2—one for insurers carrying on long-term business and the other for insurers carrying on general business. Composite insurers should use both packages in respect of long-term and general business. Each package contains a template collecting quantitative and qualitative data, technical specifications for the completion of the corresponding template, annex on discount rates, and a question and answer template. IA also finalized the package of template and technical specifications on matching adjustment for insurers carrying on long-term business. IA aims to collect sufficient and relevant data from the matching adjustment package to further analyze and formulate a set of eligible criteria in applying matching adjustment as well as to determine the adjusted spread methodology. Matching adjustment is an alternative discounting approach that reflects the assets held by individual companies based on their policies for asset and liability management.

QIS 2 is important and will offer a holistic view of the solvency position of individual insurers and the insurance industry. This would form a basis for IA to move forward to the next step of moderation exercise and to perform further testing in the third QIS. While developing the RBC regime, IA is mindful of the overarching objectives, including alignment with international standards and practices, resilience of the insurance industry for the protection of policyholders, and maintaining competitiveness of the Hong Kong insurance industry. IA has maintained close dialog with the insurance industry. Taking into account the industry feedback, IA is open to explore test options, for example, on discount rate of the long-term insurance liabilities. IA has also reflected on the feedback in certain areas in QIS 2, for example, alignment with the Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standard (HKFRS) 17 on insurance contracts to a certain extent and the proposed stress levels of certain risks. This would be a continuous process of moderation exercise, aiming to strike a balance toward a pragmatic and effective approach.

 

Related Links

Comment Due Date: November 30, 2018

Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Insurance, Risk-based Capital Regime, QIS 2, HKFRS 17, Matching Adjustment, IFRS 17, IA

Related Articles
News

US Agencies Adopt Rule to Exclude Community Banks from Volcker Rule

US Agencies (CFTC, FDIC, FED, OCC, and SEC) adopted a final rule to exclude community banks from the Volcker Rule, in line with amendments to certain sections of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Adopt Amendments to Simplify Regulatory Capital Rules

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that reduces regulatory burden by simplifying several requirements in the regulatory capital rules for banks.

July 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IA of Hong Kong Delegates Inspection and Investigation Powers to HKMA

HKMA and IA of Hong Kong jointly issued a statement announcing the delegation of the inspection and investigation powers of IA to HKMA, pursuant to the statutory regulatory regime for insurance intermediaries under the Insurance Ordinance.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Extends Implementation Timeline for Policy Recommendations on SFTs

FSB announced adjustments to the implementation timelines for its recommendations on securities financing transactions (SFTs), specifically those related to the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared SFTs.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for July 2019

EBA published answers to six questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool this week.

July 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Report Assesses Regulatory Framework for Fintech Activities

EBA published the findings of its analysis on the regulatory framework applicable to fintech firms when accessing the market.

July 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OSFI Revises Capital Requirements for Operational Risk for Banks

OSFI is revising its capital requirements for operational risk, in line with the final Basel III revisions published by BCBS in December 2017.

July 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OSFI Consults on Revised Principles for Management of Liquidity Risk

OSFI proposed revisions to Guideline B-6 on the principles for the management of liquidity risk.

July 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ESMA Guidance on Disclosures for Credit Rating Sustainability Issues

ESMA published the technical advice on sustainability considerations in the credit rating market, along with the final guidelines on disclosure requirements applicable to credit ratings.

July 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FASB Issues Q&A on Estimation of Expected Credit Losses by Firms

FASB issued a second question-and-answer (Q&A) document that addresses more than a dozen frequently asked questions related to the Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13 titled “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.”

July 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3482