IA of Hong Kong issued templates and technical specifications for the second quantitative impact study (QIS 2) on the development of risk-based capital (RBC) regime. Additionally, IA released a package of template and technical specifications on matching adjustment for insurers conducting long-term business. Authorized insurers have been requested to participate in the QIS 2 and submit the completed template(s) by November 30, 2018.
IA released two different packages for QIS 2—one for insurers carrying on long-term business and the other for insurers carrying on general business. Composite insurers should use both packages in respect of long-term and general business. Each package contains a template collecting quantitative and qualitative data, technical specifications for the completion of the corresponding template, annex on discount rates, and a question and answer template. IA also finalized the package of template and technical specifications on matching adjustment for insurers carrying on long-term business. IA aims to collect sufficient and relevant data from the matching adjustment package to further analyze and formulate a set of eligible criteria in applying matching adjustment as well as to determine the adjusted spread methodology. Matching adjustment is an alternative discounting approach that reflects the assets held by individual companies based on their policies for asset and liability management.
QIS 2 is important and will offer a holistic view of the solvency position of individual insurers and the insurance industry. This would form a basis for IA to move forward to the next step of moderation exercise and to perform further testing in the third QIS. While developing the RBC regime, IA is mindful of the overarching objectives, including alignment with international standards and practices, resilience of the insurance industry for the protection of policyholders, and maintaining competitiveness of the Hong Kong insurance industry. IA has maintained close dialog with the insurance industry. Taking into account the industry feedback, IA is open to explore test options, for example, on discount rate of the long-term insurance liabilities. IA has also reflected on the feedback in certain areas in QIS 2, for example, alignment with the Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standard (HKFRS) 17 on insurance contracts to a certain extent and the proposed stress levels of certain risks. This would be a continuous process of moderation exercise, aiming to strike a balance toward a pragmatic and effective approach.
Comment Due Date: November 30, 2018
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Insurance, Risk-based Capital Regime, QIS 2, HKFRS 17, Matching Adjustment, IFRS 17, IA
Previous ArticlePat Brennan of APRA Speaks on Implementation and Next Steps for BEAR
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.