EBA published a report that presents its findings on the monitoring of supervisory colleges for the main cross-border European banking groups. The report also sets out the colleges' action plan for 2019. Considering the progress observed in the functioning of colleges over the years, the report mainly focuses on the quality of the colleges' deliverables and highlights examples of good practice.
The report provides key observations regarding the 2018 cycle of supervisory colleges. These observations cover organizational aspects of the colleges' work and interactions, colleges' deliverables, and the key topics for supervisory attention in 2018. Seven key topics for supervisory attention had been identified for 2018 and these are non-performing loan cleaning, business model and profitability, information technology risk and operational resilience, internal governance, Brexit, structural changes, and IFRS 9. Overall, EBA identified a significant improvement in the colleges' deliverables, although further efforts are needed, particularly to ensure that the group risk/liquidity risk assessment reports form a real joint assessment of the group-wide risks.
The action plan of supervisory colleges for 2019 includes the key tasks for supervisory colleges, as defined by the legal framework; the key topics for supervisory attention; and the EBA approach for college monitoring in 2019. The list of key topics identified in the 2019 convergence plan includes internal governance, IT risk and operational resilience, non-performing exposures, and the use of benchmarking exercises for internal models. The key tasks for supervisory colleges in 2019 include the following:
- Updating the mapping of cross-border group entities with all of the relevant information envisaged in the template of Annex I of the implementing standards on the operational functioning of colleges
- Considering expanding the list of authorities with observer status in the light of the outcome of the EBA work on the equivalence assessment of the professional secrecy provisions of non-EU supervisory authorities, following the process envisaged in the Level-1 and Level-2 provisions
- Organizing physical meetings and maintaining ongoing interaction in other forms (for example, conference calls, e-mails, and written consultations)
- Adopting an annual college SEP, noting joint and individual supervisory activities, the resources committed from college members, and the timing and duration of these activities
- Organizing and establishing timelines for the joint decision cycles envisaged by the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV and the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD)
- Developing and finalizing the group risk assessment and group liquidity risk assessment
- Reaching joint decisions on capital and liquidity
- Reaching a joint decision on the assessment of group recovery plans, measures to address impediments to these plans, and the need for individual recovery plans covering entities of the group
- Organizing and concluding other joint decisions as required by the regulatory framework of CRD IV and the BRRD (for example, approving the use of internal models or the determination of a liquidity sub-group)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Supervisory Colleges, Report, SREP, Operational Risk, EBA
Previous ArticleKlaas Knot of FSB Outlines Its Regulatory and Supervisory Priorities
PRA published a set of questions and answers (Q&A) covering common queries regarding residential and commercial property valuations, for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), during the period of disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
IOSCO proposed updates to its principles for regulated entities that outsource tasks to service providers.
MAS announced that the first phase of the Veritas initiative will commence with the development of fairness metrics in credit risk scoring and customer marketing.
BoE published the Statistical Notice 2020/4 to update the buy-to-let (BTL) Phase 2 and Phase 3 definitions for the Interest Rate Type data item.
FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.
EBA published an opinion following the notification by the French macro-prudential authority, the Haut Conseil de Stabilité Financière (HCSF), of its intention to extend a measure introduced in 2018 on the use of Article 458(9) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period.
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
ECB updated the guidance notes for reporting related to the statistics on holdings of securities by reporting banking groups (SHSG).