Elke König, the SRB Chair, spoke at the ECON Committee Hearing about achievements of SRB in the last five years, implementation of the resolution framework, and the key priorities of SRB for 2019. Additionally, European Parliament published a report on the stock take of the activities of SRB over the past years. The report highlights that 2019 is a crucial year, as SRB needs to formally adopt resolution plans for all the banks under its supervision and set binding minimum requirements for bail-in-able debt, the Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL).
During the speech, Elke König mentioned that lack of a sufficient MREL could be an important barrier to executing the resolution strategy, but it is not the only barrier. The findings from the first resolution planning cycles have revealed certain areas as potential obstacles to resolution, including group structures and operations, management information systems, operational continuity, and governance and communication. Next, Elke König discussed the internal priorities for 2019, considering that resolution planning remains the core task of SRB. SRB continues to work hard on its 2019 resolution planning cycle. The resolution teams have communicated the 2019 individual priorities for each bank. She added that SRB has been working internally on updating—or rather collating—the various policies in an updated resolution planning manual to be used by the internal resolution teams and the national resolution authorities. This Autumn, SRB is expected to set out a more comprehensive outline of the resolvability expectations toward all banks, which should help public understanding. Also, this year, SRB will prepare for the implementation of bank recovery and resolution directive (BRRD) II and single resolution mechanism regulation (SRMR) II.
Ms. König mentioned that SRB wants to continue its work toward financial stability and ensure that Europe develops, deepens, and strengthens the Banking Union and the Capital Markets Union. From the SRB perspective, EU evidently needs a stronger and more harmonized capital market. Banks need to strengthen their capital as well as issue and maintain the needed MREL. This should be doable in a deep and liquid European capital market in EUR, not just USD. She added that “The much discussed EDIS project remains a priority for the SRB… . The third and final pillar of the Banking Union is vital, let’s hope we see movement on it as soon as possible.”
The SRB Chair added that the divergence of national insolvency laws is a major obstacle toward a full-fledged Banking Union. The safeguard that no creditor shall be worse-off in resolution than in insolvency is an important protection provided for in the regulation. However, there might be different results in different countries depending on the national insolvency regime, which could negatively impact on the resolution procedure. While discussing the single resolution fund (SRF) backstop in Brussels, Ms. König noted that this will be an important buffer in giving the markets confidence in a time of crisis or resolution. Liquidity in resolution is a key gap in the framework. SRF could play a role in liquidity provisioning as a last resort, but this role will be limited due to size of SRF, both during the transitionary period and after the target level is reached, even when the common backstop has been added. Addressing this issue will materially enhance financial stability.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, MREL, BRRD 2, SRMR 2, Banking Union, Resolution Framework, European Parliament, SRB
Previous ArticleSARB Consults on Margin Requirements for Uncleared OTC Derivatives
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).