IMF issued a technical note that provides an assessment of the recent development of regulation and supervision of the insurance sector in India. It is part of the 2017 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) for India. The note focuses on several key developments in the regulation and supervision of the insurance sector since the last FSAP and evaluates the extent to which the recommendations of the 2011 India FSAP have been addressed. The note, however, does not present a full assessment of observance of IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs).
The staff finds that most of the 2011 FSAP recommendations on insurance regulation have been addressed. Issues with the independence of Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) and overly informal approach in some areas, including solvency control levels and the arrangements for cooperation with other regulatory bodies, have been resolved. Public and private insurers are now subject to the same regulation, although there remain some structural advantages for the public-sector life insurers and reinsurers. Revisions to the key insurance law have transferred powers from government to IRDAI, including wider powers to issue regulations. Key recommendations of the 2017 FSAP include the following:
- Formulate a strategy, plan, and timetable for modernization of the solvency framework
- Consider the expected new IFRS 17 on insurance liabilities (as an input into solvency valuation requirements) and the well-advanced new IAIS Insurance Capital Standards to be adapted and recalibrated as necessary for application to the Indian market, or IRDAI could draw on established approaches in other Asian countries (that is, Singapore)
- Implement only a standardized approach (as internal models are a complex option) to risk-based capital, covering all risks, and require insurers to develop an Own Risk and Solvency Assessment
- Move to a more risk-based framework for supervision, which would complement risk-based capital and encourage better risk management
- Consider further measures to level the playing field for insurers in the limited areas where there are, or may be perceived to be, advantages for public sector insurers
IRDAI is working with the industry on plans for economic valuation for solvency purposes and risk-based capital. India is an outlier—both in Asia and internationally—in not having moved in this direction so far. The insurance resolution framework appears comprehensive, though untested. IRDAI has decided, in the light of issuance of a final IFRS on insurance liabilities in May 2017 (IFRS 17, due to take effect in January 2021), to defer implementation of Ind AS to coincide with IFRS 17 implementation. Implementation of IFRS from financial year 2020–21 will require a move toward economic valuation for financial statements. IRDAI is monitoring the impact of Ind AS via private reporting. In discussion, insurers noted that the most significant impact of Ind AS would come through IFRS 17.
The overall insurance penetration in the country remains relatively low and public-sector insurers continue to command a majority of the market. Life insurance predominates, with about 75% of total premiums. Non-life insurance is dominated by motor insurance. Penetration rates remain unchanged from 2011 and are generally lower than in comparator countries, especially in non-life. While traditional sale channels continue to predominate, there is an increasing diversity in distribution. Risks in life insurance are relatively well-spread and in non-life are mainly short-term. The sector is profitable and solvency exceeds minimum requirements, but with exceptions.
Related Link: Technical Note on Insurance Sector
Previous ArticleAPRA Commences Post-Implementation Review of Prudential Framework
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.