ESMA Issues Report on Fees Charged by CRAs and Trade Repositories
ESMA published a thematic report on fees charged by credit rating agencies (CRAs) and trade repositories. This report follows the conclusion of the supervisory review of ESMA on the fee structures in the credit rating and trade repository industries. The thematic report identifies the areas for improvement regarding transparency and disclosure, the fee-setting process, and the interaction with entities related to CRAs and trade repositories. Going forward, these areas will form the core of the supervisory focus of ESMA.
The report contains views of ESMA on the application of the requirements that fees charged by CRAs should be non-discriminatory and cost-based and that trade repositories provide non-discriminatory access and charge publicly disclosed and cost-related fees. ESMA identified the following key concerns related to the fee provisions and improvements in the practices followed by CRAs and trade repositories:
- Transparency and disclosure. CRAs and trade repositories need to ensure sufficiency and clarity of information provided to actual and potential clients as well as to ESMA. CRA clients should be able to understand the key elements of the fee schedule and reasons for deviations from it, in addition to the reasons of price increases/decreases. Trade repositories can achieve more transparency by reducing complexity and increasing comparability of fee schedules and by disclosing sufficient information, to enable clients to estimate additional reporting costs.
- Fee-setting process. CRAs and trade repositories must ensure that cost is a key pricing factor and sufficient controls are in place to demonstrate that the regulatory objectives regarding pricing are met.
- Interaction with entities related to CRAs and trade repositories. CRAs must ensure that provision of rating-related services by affiliated entities does not conflict with the non-discrimination and cost-based principles. Trade repositories that are part of a group need to ensure that intra-group transactions are on reasonable terms and on an "arms' length principle" to prevent discriminatory access and unfair cost allocation.
Related Link: Press Release
Keywords: Europe, Securities, CRA, Trade Repositories, Fee-Setting Process, Disclosures, ESMA
Previous Article
ECB Published Opinion on a Draft Law on Request from NBBRelated Articles
OSFI Issues Phase2 Consultation on Climate Scenario Exercise for Banks
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) recently announced a consultation on the second phase of the Standardized Climate Scenario Exercise (SCSE) for banks and other financial institutions it regulates in Canada.
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.