Stress Testing Evolution: A Scalable Approach to Maximize Your Investment
This webinar discusses how to leverage stress testing processes for tactical and strategic decision-making.
Institutions have spent an enormous amount of time, energy, and capital meeting stress testing expectations set by regulators. However, with established and approved methodologies banks have coalesced around a standard for loss and resource estimation approaches. If designed properly, a stress testing framework can be a powerful risk management and strategic planning tool providing banks with a distinct competitive advantage.
This webinar discusses how to leverage stress testing processes for tactical and strategic decision-making.
Moody's Analytics experts Joy Hart and Ed Young discuss how banks can:
- Extract timely and meaningful information from stress testing exercises
- Leverage stress testing processes for strategic decision-making and capital planning
- Translate portfolio exposures into potential impact on earnings for bank executives
Related Articles
Adjusting Capital Planning and Strategies for a COVID-19 Scenario
Nobody expected the end of the economic cycle to happen so suddenly, but adjustments will be required given the materiality of the events unfolding. How can you quickly adjust for an ever-evolving scenario where today’s assumptions may not hold tomorrow.
Stress Testing Under COVID-19
In this paper, we propose an alternative simple, coherent methodology that allows us to forecast and stress test the entire balance sheet and income statement for all of the roughly 6,000 banks in the United States consistently.
Incorporation of CECL Into Stress Testing and Capital Planning
Join our experts as they review the business challenges that CECL presents beyond the reporting date numbers.
Moody's Analytics Webinar: The Changing Landscape for Model Risk Management
Join Chartis Research and Moody’s Analytics as we discuss ways institutions can achieve effective model validation techniques and processes amidst the growing technological and regulatory environment.
Predicting Earnings: CECL's Implications for Allowance Forecasts
The primary objective of FASB’s CECL standard is to provide investors with more meaningful and timely information regarding credit risk, but it also presents a unique opportunity for financial institutions to advance credit risk practices, break down silos and strengthen business decisions.
Predicting Earnings: CECL's Implications for Allowance Forecasts
In this article, we demonstrate the effect of the new allowance framework by quantifying allowances and credit earnings volatility for a sample portfolio.
DFAST Quick Takes: Looking Toward CCAR Results
This article outlines recent approaches to managing credit risk when facing regulatory capital requirements. We explore how institutions should best allocate capital and make economically-optimized investment decisions under regulatory capital constraints, such as those imposed by Basel or CCAR-style rules.
Reading the Tea Leaves of Recent Regulatory Guidance
In this article, we review the common themes reflected in recent regulatory guidelines released by the Federal Reserve and the BCBS.
Making Risk Appetite Stick: How Data and Analytics Can Help
In this webinar, we discuss how institutions can overcome challenges to ensure that risk appetite can be monitored as well as key analytic metrics which can be leveraged for strategic decision-making.
Reading the Tea Leaves of Recent Regulatory Guidance
December 2015 was a busy month for regulatory agencies and global standard setters. Throughout the year the industry has been waiting for additional guidance on high impact topics including capital planning and allowance methodologies, and in the final stretch of 2015 both the Federal Reserve and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) complied. This paper will primarily focus on common themes in the two releases.
