IMF Counsellor on Macroprudential Policy and Financial Vulnerabilities
Tobias Adrian, IMF Financial Counsellor, spoke about macro-prudential policy and financial vulnerabilities. He noted that policy makers might care about sharp movements in financial conditions, even if those do not necessarily lead to systemic disruptions of the financial sector’s intermediation capacity.
Cyclical macro-prudential policy is often described as mitigating systemic risk in the time dimension. Mr. Adrian said, "I distinguish financial vulnerabilities from financial conditions." Financial conditions refer to the ease of financing across funding markets, including credit, equity, money, and foreign currency markets, reflecting the pricing of risk and underwriting standards in different asset markets. When financial vulnerability is high and financial conditions are loose, risks to financial stability are likely higher than when financial vulnerability is high and financial conditions are broadly neutral. The key frictions such as extrapolative expectations, competition leading to excessive risk-taking across institutions, and the leverage cycle due to risk management practices can lead to excessive variation in financial conditions that can be fueled by certain market failures. In the face of these frictions, the tasks of cyclical macro-prudential policies are two-fold: to lean against the buildup of financial vulnerabilities for reducing macro-financial amplification mechanisms and to build temporary buffers when financial conditions are overly easy and financial vulnerabilities are growing.
He further noted that there is clearly a close connection to monetary policy, which acts by impacting financial conditions. Monetary policy can also be steered deliberately to offset changes in financial conditions. As per Mr. Adrian, "The advantage of using monetary policy more systematically to steer financial conditions is that it can get into all of the cracks, while macro-prudential policy can be arbitraged across jurisdictions, markets, or institutions. There are also limitations to using monetary policy. Monetary policy cannot induce changes in resilience, unlike macro-prudential policy. Monetary policy is not targeted enough to address differential financial conditions across sectors of the economy. Furthermore, monetary policy has price stability as primary mandate. It may not be able to respond enough to offset a build-up of risks given trade-offs relative to its inflation objective." Talking about the way forward, he argued that cyclical macro-prudential policy might aim at mitigating sharp movements in financial conditions, even if those do not entail system disruptions in the intermediation capacity of the financial system. There is ample evidence that adverse movements to financial conditions impact risks to GDP growth adversely, even in the absence of systemic disruptions.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: International, Banking, Macro-Prudential Policy, Financial Vulnerabilities, Financial Stability, IMF
Previous Article
RBNZ Issues Consultation on Review of Capital Adequacy FrameworkRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.