ESMA Clarifies Endorsement Regime for Third-Country Credit Ratings
ESMA published the final report updating its guidelines on the application of the endorsement regime under the Credit Rating Agencies (CRA) Regulation. The guidelines on the application of the endorsement regime will take effect on January 01, 2019. ESMA also published its final report on Technical Advice on CRA regulatory equivalence—CRA 3 update. CRA 3 will enter into force on June 01, 2018 for the purposes of endorsement and equivalence.
The report on the application of endorsement regime details a number of changes and clarifications to the existing guidelines. The updates focus on the obligations of the endorsing CRA, the conduct of the third-country CRA, and the third-country legal and supervisory framework. The report also clarifies ESMA’s supervisory powers over endorsed credit ratings and the notion of objective reasons. The effective date of January 01, 2019 for the endorsement regime will allow CRAs sufficient time to adapt policies and procedures to take into account ESMA’s additional guidance on the requirements, which are as stringent as EU requirements that are to be developed by ESMA in 2018. The final report on the Technical Advice to the EC assesses the legal and supervisory framework of the nine jurisdictions (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, Singapore, and United States), which until now have been eligible for equivalence and endorsement.
The entry into force of the 2013 amendments to the CRA Regulation (CRA 3), and the associated introduction of new requirements to endorsed ratings in 2018, provided an opportunity for ESMA to review the regime more broadly. Endorsement is a regime under the CRA Regulation, which allows credit ratings issued by a third-country CRA, and endorsed by an EU CRA, to be used for regulatory purposes in the EU. Endorsement is used by the largest CRAs in the EU. Equivalence allows a non-systemic CRA without any physical presence in the EU to be certified by ESMA. At present, four certified CRAs located in three non-EU jurisdictions rely on this regime. ESMA has concluded that the local legal and supervisory frameworks of these three jurisdictions, as well as those of Canada and Hong Kong, meet the objectives of the additional CRA 3 requirements for the purposes of equivalence. The countries whose legal and supervisory frameworks were assessed as not fully meeting the requirements are Argentina, Australia, Brazil and Singapore. However, the CRAs established in these jurisdictions currently rely only on the endorsement regime—not on equivalence.
Related Links
- Final Report on Endorsement Regime Guidelines (PDF)
- Technical Advice on CRA Regulatory Equivalence (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, CRA 3, CRA Regulation, Equivalence, Endorsement Regime, ESMA
Previous Article
Central Bank of Brazil Publishes Consultation Related to IFRS 9Related Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.